mathemachristian [he/him]

fair enough do you have that graph comparing gulag mortalities in the 50s to amount of DOJ prisoner deaths by any chance? It might be an even better illustration.

right but this person isnt really the nuanced type, they're cherrypicking and so am I

guess they didn’t make it that far…

Wont somebody *please* think of the poor princes??? How many kids had to grow up without their nazi collaborator dad there to guide them on the path of ~~fascism~~ anticommunism?

It’s in a similar vein to this quote from Assata Shakur I have never really understood exactly what a ‘liberal’ is, since I have heard ‘liberals’ express every conceivable opinion on every conceivable subject. As far as I can tell, you have the extreme right, who are fascist racist capitalist dogs like Ronald Reagan, who come right out and let you know where they’re coming from. And on the opposite end, you have the left, who are supposed to be committed to justice, equality, and human rights. And somewhere between those two points is the liberal. As far as I’m concerned, ‘liberal’ is the most meaningless word in the dictionary. History has shown me that as long as some white middle-class people can live high on the hog, take vacations to Europe, send their children to private schools, and reap the benefits of their white skin privilege, then they are ‘liberal’. But when times get hard and money gets tight, they pull off that liberal mask and you think you’re talking to Adolf Hitler. They feel sorry for the so-called underprivileged just as long as they can maintain their own privileges.

Iran is right about which rules are universal

I don’t know how much clearer it gets??? Who’s gonna argue that UNCLOS is universal anyway? The US or pissrael? Neither of which are party to the UNCLOS and who very much assert authority outside their territorial waters?

yes

Iran is right about which rules are universal (innocent passage, not transit passage). … The U.S. is also not a party to UNCLOS.

Those iran's waters. These ships are literally passing through their country, I think you're confused with "territorial waters" as defined in UNCLOS as well but neither Iran nor the US nor pissrael ratified that treaty. Here is a good opinion on why the UNCLOS doesn't really apply https://www.simplelaw.blog/p/the-strait-of-hormuz-a-3-minute-international

I thought they meant this law but wasn't sure. That treaty has not been ratified by the US, Pissrael and most importantly, Iran! So it doesn't apply and we are talking about a war where neither the invading nations nor the victim nation has signed it. https://www.simplelaw.blog/p/the-strait-of-hormuz-a-3-minute-international

Which law?

it's a fucking toll you dingus those are iranian waters

It’s a marxist history book written by a radical leftist and is very influential in black liberation movements like the black panthers.

Free Radio Othala CIA-bot detected 🤖

lemmy.ml/post/22417306

lemmy.ml/post/43309494

lemmy.ml/post/43309494

Live pugjesus reaction: 😱🫨🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬😤😤😮‍💨🛏️

lol you are a zionist bootlicker caping for pissraeli bombs I tried to get through to you that the zionist entity was always genocidal since the nakba.

You think the zionist entity has a right to defend it’s stolen land, don’t you?

Genocide has a different definition so that’s simply not true. According to Yehuda Bauer: [Genocide is] the planned destruction, since the mid-nineteenth century, of a racial, national, or ethnic group as such, by the following means: (a) selective mass murder of elites or parts of the population; (b) elimination of national (racial, ethnic) culture and religious life with the intent of “denationalization”; © enslavement, with the same intent; (d) destruction of national (racial, ethnic) economic life, with the same intent; (e) biological decimation through the kidnapping of children, or the prevention of normal family life, with the same intent… [Holocaust is] the planned physical annihilation, for ideological or pseudo-religious reasons, of all the members of a national, ethnic, or racial group. Aside from © I think all apply to what Israel has been doing forever. Not all media is as biased as you think in Europe. I live in Germany. All the news sources here have been reporting hasbara like “decapitated babies” since day one, all reports out of Palestine get qualified with shit like “according to the hamas-led health ministry…”. They’re all in lockstep, look at what they did to Hüseyin Dogru if you want an example of what happens if you break rank. Germans even started calling Iraqi people Iraqi instead of the german “Iraker” during the US war on Iraq because we’re that far up the US state departements ass.

See even now you’re still putting qualifiers on your “support”. The genocide and settlerism has been going on before netanyahu or “his administration”. It’s baked into the system. This is like complaining about president botha during the fight against apartheid. And that “obviously biased” news sourced, is itself sourced. You’re not gonna get an MSNBC newspiece or whatever it is you consider “unbiased” because all of western mainstream media is owned and controlled by capitalists and they have a vested interest in the zionist project. Also your statement that there are non-genocidal isntreally bombs is a pretty bold one all things considered, care to give an example of one such bomb you would consider justified?

It’s well sourced and has been reliable for the last years. You can close your eyes and ears and continue caping for settlers of course. I stand with the resistance against genocide.

👏👏👏

🔥🔥🔥🔥 dubul’ ibhunu