Remote
Kanrei
@kanrei@mastodon.art
#furry #FurryArtist #tanuki
#artist #illustrator
#nonbinary (any pronoun is ok)
0
Followers
0
Following
9
Posts
Joined April 27, 2022
Website:
Furaffinity:
Twitter:
Instagram:
Posts
Replying to
@kanrei@mastodon.art
@wibble @AuthorJMac @Uddelhexe
With AI it feels kinda hard though to see what is AI and what is not. I sure find it more and more difficult to differentiate. Sure when one uses AI one can actually even see which AI or model might have been used for a picture.
People using AI might even try to give it off as human made picture.
When photography came out, it sure looked different than paintings.Thus not really trying to be the same thing?
Replying to
@kanrei@mastodon.art
@wibble @AuthorJMac @Uddelhexe
About photography, I sure see the fun in there. From what I know, it also started out with trying to imitate what oil paintings did, but sure now it feels like its own thing, serving different purpose than paintings etc. (But ok that's probably because the idea to show reality through paintings got switched over to photography, or at least partially. Like scientific illustration is still a thing. People still buy painted portraits etc.)
Replying to
@kanrei@mastodon.art
@wibble @AuthorJMac @Uddelhexe
But it's unlikely anyway that the idea will be that artists have to switch to it, they likely cut out people and it will be a low paying job, because everyone can ask the AI things and AI devs sure will make the AI more in a direction, where one can easily use it. (I mean like compare Stable Diffusion with Bing AI for example.)
Replying to
@AuthorJMac@indiepocalypse.social
@wibble @AuthorJMac @Uddelhexe
Yeah, I just see for myself, I wouldn't enjoy making AI pictures instead of drawing right away what I had in mind. It is ok to dabble around in it to see what it can do, and I sure want to try it out more. But overall I wouldn't find it very fulfilling.
Replying to
@AuthorJMac@indiepocalypse.social
@wibble @AuthorJMac @Uddelhexe
Oh not sure how it went for painters, but at least they still exist. I actually feel like I should draw more with traditional media again, because of AI.
:/ Either way, I don't want artistic jobs being gone. (Not even knowing an alternative, feels like anything done on a computer would be at risk.)
Replying to
@AuthorJMac@indiepocalypse.social
@narinarinari @AuthorJMac Wait, no way AI is made for programmers, like the AI generating text also can generate some code, and it seems like some feel like it could reduce programmers? (I would say they are in the same boat as we artists, no?)
Replying to
@kanrei@mastodon.art
@wibble @AuthorJMac @Uddelhexe
I don't think people condemn all AI, when they talk about AI. Like the ones used for science to analyze large amount of data, that's sure something useful.
Or things which can upscale a picture or choosing an object when clicking on it, that's also not something people see as bad.
But AI generating pictures, 3D models, text etc. that's something people worry about.
Some already feel their impact and worry it might get worse.
Replying to
@AuthorJMac@indiepocalypse.social
@wibble @AuthorJMac @Uddelhexe Well for art, it certainly isn't fun if we would use AI instead of creating our own thing. So yes in that regard it would take away the fun part. Plus people might lose jobs, because companies rather use AI to make pictures. (Even if someone would do those, they might just need one person for it and not more, which they might have needed before.)
That's what we mean with losing the fun jobs.