FenTiger

@mariusor@metalhead.club That library doesn't look like it's seen much activity recently. I ended up using this one and I've found the maintainer to be very responsive.

Quote of the day:

And it's not really in the spirit of decentralization if you have to reimplement the same feature multiple times across the internet.

Oh, hello Lemmy. Feeling talkative today, are we?

@Phantasm Great article - I've added it to my bookmark list - thank you! I'm of the opinion that trying to "block" the "bad people" can never work. It's just not compatible with the way the Fediverse works, at a very basic level. The only access control mechanisms worth building are based on "allowing" the "good people". More here.

Hi @@mariusor@metalhead.club!

I just managed to make a C2S post to my work-in-progress ActivityPub instance using your BOX client.

I had to make a couple of minor changes to it:

• The authorize command respects $HTTPS_PROXY, but the post command doesn't. I had to change this to get it to talk to services on my test network.
• It doesn't send an OAuth state parameter; the OAuth server library I'm using complains about this so I fixed it.

Are you interested in patches/PRs? What's the best way to submit them?

#ActivityPubDev