Elektrine
EN
Log in Register
Paige Chat Timeline Communities Gallery Videos Email DNS VPN Uptime Kairo
Back to Timeline
Remote

Eigil Rischel

@eigil@mathstodon.xyz
mastodon 4.6.4
  • Open on mathstodon.xyz

Research Consultant at the Tallinn University of Technology.

I work on applications of category theory to probability theory.

25 Followers
81 Following
11 Posts
Joined June 11, 2017
Homepage:
erischel.com

Posts

Open post
eigil
Eigil Rischel @eigil@mathstodon.xyz · May 07, 2026
Eigil Rischel
@eigil@mathstodon.xyz

Research Consultant at the Tallinn University of Technology. I work on applications of category theory to probability theory.

mathstodon.xyz
Replying to @johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz
@johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz @julesh@mathstodon.xyz @pigworker@types.pl Mathematicians tend to call containers "polynomial functors". David Spivak has written a lot about them under this name.
1
1
0
0
Open post
eigil
Eigil Rischel @eigil@mathstodon.xyz · May 07, 2026
Eigil Rischel
@eigil@mathstodon.xyz

Research Consultant at the Tallinn University of Technology. I work on applications of category theory to probability theory.

mathstodon.xyz
Replying to @bentnib@types.pl
@bentnib @mkerjean Are extended abstracts (or papers, fot that matter) supposed to be anonymized? I can't see any info about this on the website.
0
1
0
0
Open post
eigil
Eigil Rischel @eigil@mathstodon.xyz · May 07, 2026
Eigil Rischel
@eigil@mathstodon.xyz

Research Consultant at the Tallinn University of Technology. I work on applications of category theory to probability theory.

mathstodon.xyz
Replying to @olynch@mathstodon.xyz
@olynch@mathstodon.xyz I like this way of displaying slides on the web - how did you make this?
0
1
0
0
Open post
eigil
Eigil Rischel @eigil@mathstodon.xyz · May 06, 2026
Eigil Rischel
@eigil@mathstodon.xyz

Research Consultant at the Tallinn University of Technology. I work on applications of category theory to probability theory.

mathstodon.xyz
Replying to @julesh@mathstodon.xyz
@julesh@mathstodon.xyz X can be recovered from PX as the set of elements with exactly one other element below them (in the inclusion order, which can be recovered from the order on 2 and observing that Hom(X,-) preserves limits, so carries posets to posets).
1
0
0
0
Open post
eigil
Eigil Rischel @eigil@mathstodon.xyz · Apr 30, 2026
Eigil Rischel
@eigil@mathstodon.xyz

Research Consultant at the Tallinn University of Technology. I work on applications of category theory to probability theory.

mathstodon.xyz
Replying to @skewray@mathstodon.xyz
@skewray@mathstodon.xyz I'm sorry to say I think most of the available material on Markov categories is written for category theorists. @paolop@mathstodon.xyz might know of a good source here. (Tobias' paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.07021 is a comprehensive introduction which is not *too* heavy on category theory, but still very much written for categorists)
2
3
0
0
Open post
eigil
Eigil Rischel @eigil@mathstodon.xyz · Apr 30, 2026
Eigil Rischel
@eigil@mathstodon.xyz

Research Consultant at the Tallinn University of Technology. I work on applications of category theory to probability theory.

mathstodon.xyz
Replying to @eigil@mathstodon.xyz
An interesting question here is whether there exists such a category where \(\mathcal{C}_\mathrm{det} \cong \mathsf{Set}\), or more generally a commutative monad on \(\mathsf{Set}\) so that the Kleisli category has Kolmogorov products. The Vitali sets prove that it can't be given by the ordinary distribution monad on countable sets, but doesn't rule out some more exotic construction. It is interesting to ask which, say, toposes, admit a probability monad with Kolmogorov products which behaves "as expected", maybe formalized by saying the distributions on the natural numbers object should all be discrete, i.e given by a point of the countable-dimensional simplex.
0
5
0
0
Open post
eigil
Eigil Rischel @eigil@mathstodon.xyz · Apr 30, 2026
Eigil Rischel
@eigil@mathstodon.xyz

Research Consultant at the Tallinn University of Technology. I work on applications of category theory to probability theory.

mathstodon.xyz
Replying to @eigil@mathstodon.xyz
I actually find this lemma quite surprising. A priori, I would expect this map \(1 \to 2\) to correspond to some sort of infinitesimal probability. But apparently the axioms here rule this out. Currently I'm trying to work out how much these axioms can be weakened. The proof relies heavily on the assumption that \(\mathcal{C}_\mathrm{det}\) is Boolean, but this is very strong. It would be great to apply this idea to toposes or similar to construct canonical probability monads. If \(\mathcal{C}_\mathrm{det}\) has enough structure to construct a Dedekind real numbers object and a subobject classifier, we can define a kernel \(b: [0,1] \to \Omega\), given by sampling a stream from \(u: 1 \to 2^\mathbb{N}\), viewing it as the binary expansion of a real number in the interval, and comparing it with the input. One can try to ask under what assumptions this family of distributions satisfies the expected equations (\(b(x) \wedge b(y) = b(xy), \neg b(x) = b(1-x)\) , etc). I think I have some ideas here but this is still work in progress.
0
1
0
0
Open post
eigil
Eigil Rischel @eigil@mathstodon.xyz · Apr 30, 2026
Eigil Rischel
@eigil@mathstodon.xyz

Research Consultant at the Tallinn University of Technology. I work on applications of category theory to probability theory.

mathstodon.xyz
Replying to @eigil@mathstodon.xyz
Lemma: in any category as above, let \(\chi: 2^\mathbb{N} \to 2\) be the (deterministic) indicator function for the subobject of sequences that contain infinitely many ones (note that this is definable internally). Let \(u: 1 \to 2^\mathbb{N}\) be the infinite independent pairing of the coinflip with itself. Then the map \(\chi \circ u : 1 \to 2\) is equal to the constant \(1\) map. It follows that \(u\) factors over the inclusion of the subobject \(\chi^{-1}(1)\). In particular it factors over the inclusion of the subobject of sequences with at least one \(1\). In other words, given an infinite sequence of independent fair coinflips, there will be infinitely many ones. This is of course true in classical probability theory (but false in some Markov categories, for example of sets and total relations). Proof(sketch): it is apparent that \(\chi\) is independent of any finite prefix of its argument. It follows from the abstract version of Kolmogorov's 0-1 law (proved in https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02769) that \(\chi u : 1 \to 2\) is deterministic. If we let \(\chi'\) be the indicator of sequences with infinitely many zeroes, then \((\chi,\chi') u : 1 \to 2 \times 2\) is also deterministic. It follows that it is equal to \((\chi u, \chi' u)\). But this latter is clearly equal to \((\chi u, \chi u)\) by the symmetry of the coinflip. By postcomposing with \(\vee : 2 \times 2 \to 2\), and observing that each sequence must have infinitely many ones or zeroes, we obtain the desired identity.
1
1
0
0
Open post
eigil
Eigil Rischel @eigil@mathstodon.xyz · Apr 30, 2026
Eigil Rischel
@eigil@mathstodon.xyz

Research Consultant at the Tallinn University of Technology. I work on applications of category theory to probability theory.

mathstodon.xyz
Replying to @eigil@mathstodon.xyz
It is not so hard to see why you get every kernel this way. Every kernel \(A \to B\) can be written as a measurable function \(f: A \times [0,1] \to B\) composed with the Lebesgue measure \(1 \to [0,1]\), which in turn is measure-isomorphic to the "infinite independent coinflip" measure \(1 \to 2^\mathbb{N}\). This can be constructed using the coinflip and the property that \(2^\mathbb{N}\) is a Kolmogorov product. It is much more subtle to see that every identity between such kernels is a consequence of the axioms. The full proof is complicated (and very ugly currently, although I have ideas for how to make it more conceptual), but I'll sketch a key lemma which contains the general idea.
0
8
0
0
Open post
eigil
Eigil Rischel @eigil@mathstodon.xyz · Apr 30, 2026
Eigil Rischel
@eigil@mathstodon.xyz

Research Consultant at the Tallinn University of Technology. I work on applications of category theory to probability theory.

mathstodon.xyz

On the occasion of my return to Mathstodon, a short note about my most recent preprint, The Universal Property of Measure-Theoretic Probability (https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15485).

To summarize, I prove the following theorem: Among Markov categories \(\mathcal{C}\) such that
- The deterministic subcategory \(\mathcal{C}_\mathrm{det}\) is countably complete, (countably) extensive and Boolean,
- the inclusion \(\mathcal{C}_\mathrm{det} \hookrightarrow \mathcal{C}\) preserves the countable coproducts, pullbacks along coproduct inclusions, and carries the countable products to *Kolmogorov products* (in the sense of my previous paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02769 with Tobias Fritz),
- there exists a morphism \(1 \to 1+1\) satisfying some equations identifying it as a "fair coinflip" (such a morphism is unique if it exists),
(and Markov functors which preserve this structure in an obvious sense), the usual Markov category \(\mathsf{BorelStoch}\) of standard Borel measurable spaces and measurable Markov kernels is (bi-) initial.

This uses a previous result by Chen, that the category of standard Borel spaces and measurable functions is initial among categories satisfying the requirements for \(\mathcal{C}_\mathrm{det}\) above. Thus the really interesting part is that, combined with the assumptions about how the stochastic maps interact with the limits and colimits (point 2 above), adjoining a single binary stochastic map suffices to generate all the probability measures, and moreover to prove all the equations between them!

10
9
3
1
Open post
eigil
Eigil Rischel @eigil@mathstodon.xyz · Apr 30, 2026
Eigil Rischel
@eigil@mathstodon.xyz

Research Consultant at the Tallinn University of Technology. I work on applications of category theory to probability theory.

mathstodon.xyz
Replying to @andrejbauer@mathstodon.xyz
@andrejbauer@mathstodon.xyz I created a separate user for it, which only has access to the stuff I want it to work on, then run claude code from a shell logged into that account. This may be more annoying to do with the desktop app, not sure.
0
0
0
0

Remote instance

mathstodon.xyz
Open on original server
313k7r1n3
Elektrine

Tor hidden service

elekhj7afj4qnrr4yd3bkzslsyo5jgfxw3orgjkhlcxifueodybyiiad.onion

Platform

  • Email
  • Chat
  • Timeline
  • Communities
  • VPN
  • DNS

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • FAQ

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Warrant Canary
  • Lite (no JS)
  • VPN Policy
  • Source code

Support

  • support@elektrine.com
  • Report Security Issue
Mail client setup IMAP mail.elektrine.com:993 POP3 mail.elektrine.com:995 SMTP mail.elektrine.com:465
© 2026 Elektrine. All rights reserved. Server: 17:41:41 UTC