Remote
społeczny prymityw podłączony do sieci
114
Followers
141
Following
13
Posts
Joined March 06, 2021
pronouns:
he/him
Posts
Replying to
@davidgerard@circumstances.run
@davidgerard@circumstances.run Fuck Framework, but isn't that relatively standard practice? Patenting something and then dedicating the patent to the public domain to keep it open.
IANAL, and I don't remember the exact reasoning behind that practice (been a while since I've read about patent law), but I think this lets you avoid future disputes with patent trolls or something like that? I've definitely seen patents made with the explicit purpose of making them public domain and preventing further patents before.
Open post
Replying to
@aartaka@merveilles.town
@aartaka@merveilles.town irc client! maybe a password manager. file manager?
1
0
0
0
Open post
Open post
Replying to
@szkodnix@sk.szkod.ovh
@szkodnix@sk.szkod.ovh @Lacze@hear-me.social pomyliłem się w oryginalnym poście, to chyba fork Element X
1
3
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@wolf480pl@mstdn.io
@wolf480pl@mstdn.io nie potrzeba żadnego zaproszenia by pobrać aplikację, wisi ona normalnie na google play. bazuje chyba na Element X?
sam serwer za to wymaga chyba zaproszenia
0
0
0
0
Open post
Nasz rząd wypuścił własny komunikator do wewnętrznego użytku[1], i wraz z nim taką piękną tabelkę porównawczą. W przeciwieństwie do Signala ma on Pivacy by design - zajebiście!
Whatsapp i Signal też podobno nie są zgodne z RODO. Gdyby tylko była jakaś instytucja która by była w stanie coś z z tym zrobić... O, i Telegrama nie dotyczą żadne jurysdykcje. xD
https://www.gov.pl/web/baza-wiedzy/komunikator-mszyfr
[1] na bazie Matrixa (i dobrze), klient chyba ich własny.
(swoją drogą, mimo że to jest "open source", nigdzie nie widzę kodu. klasyk)
15
17
7
0
Open post
Replying to
@dzwdz@tilde.zone
@alderwick still doesn't seem to be documented tho, lol. might submit a patch
1
0
0
0
Open post
Open post
Replying to
@alderwick@merveilles.town
@alderwick Note that unveil would be useless for this, as it only affects the process it's run in. exec() resets the unveil state, and your child processes can do whatever they want.
It's a common misconception people have about unveil but OpenBSD refuses to document this :(
0
1
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@soatok@furry.engineer
@soatok Any clues as to how that would be done, to someone unfamiliar with the Matrix protocol (but willing to read up)?
I'm trying to understand the actual impact here - I don't get why the key exchange resulting in the identity key is bad within the context of Matrix specifically.
1
0
0
0
Open post
Replying to
@janneke@todon.nl
@janneke@todon.nl Are you referring to Everything? It's been ages since I used Windows, but Everything _was_ great!
The closest *nix counterpart would probably be locate(1), as both use a prebuilt index, but Everything uses some fancy NTFS features to keep the index always updated, pretty much for free, while locate has to rescan the entire fs every day or so.
Maybe you can get by without an index - in practice bfs(1) tends to be fast enough for me on my SSD - but without one you can't really implement niceties such as instant incremental search.
4
2
0
0
Remote instance
tilde.zone
Open on original server