D.C.U.K.

@mattblaze@federate.social The tax implications might mean that this is a (minor) overall loss for soldiers since the benefit that was transferred to the "warrior dividend" was tax-exempt.

@lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world This, but also Mozilla Foundation.

@mattblaze@federate.social What possible justification is there! Secrecy for combat? I'm sure no new law is needed. Secrecy for law enforcement? The military is not allowed to do that, constitutionally. Secrecy for research? The Air Force has half of Nevada to play with. Did the house republicans just go "any rule involving the military makes them less effective somehow!". Hopefully this doesn't become law.

@mattblaze@federate.social Those people at least had the sense not to call it that brazenly. It was "enhanced interrogation". How far we've fallen.

@mattblaze@federate.social Is the nodal point where all the light converges before hitting the mirror/sensor on the other side as an inverted image? It's hard to describe with words what.