brenda

@King_Noticer@poa.st @Eiswald@poa.st @egirlyuumimain@poa.st @stoner713@poa.st Uh, yes? Which is worse, letting the baby get eaten or not letting it get to that point at all? Sorry but forcing women who cannot financially support a child to give birth puts babies in foster care and onto the plates of billionaires. Forced birth leads to child abuse, neglect, lack of economic stability, lack of food stability, and lack of education, none of which is pro life or pro family. And if your solution is for women to simply not get pregnant, we can achieve that by making birth control more available and giving life/death sentences to rape. And of course encouraging men to keep it in their pants because ultimately they have the ability to decide when and where they want to inject their garbage seed. Women don't.

@stoner713@poa.st No because a clump of cells is not a person. Being anti-abortion is being pro-child abuse. Less abortions = more kids in the foster care systems = more kids being trafficked = more Epsteins abusing children. Thank you for letting me know you are pro child abuse and pro child exploitation. As if I didn't already know.

Sure, men commit 95% of all violent crimes, murders, rape and sexual abuse cases, child abuse cases, and animal abuse cases, but women are mean and that's so much worse 🥺 -what men on the internet actually believe

@King_Noticer@poa.st @egirlyuumimain@poa.st @Eiswald@poa.st @stoner713@poa.st >Erm that clump of cells that isn’t even a life would have a bad life if we didn’t kill-erm terminate it, therefore it’s ok Imagine saying this when we literally have confirmation that billionaires eat babies.