@lw
Understood, but namespaces would IMO be much cleaner here: you would create a NS with IPv4 - so your main NS could stay IPv6 only.
But yes: its a tad more complex and not supported by wg-quick
adrian_blx
@adrian_blx@mas.to
mastodon
4.5.9
Macht irgendwas mit Computern
0
Followers
0
Following
Joined October 31, 2022
codeberg:
Posts
@adrian_blx@mas.to
·
Apr 08, 2026
0
0
0
@adrian_blx@mas.to
·
Apr 08, 2026
@lw
You could also have the interface which WG needs to connect in its own namespace and move the wg interface out into whatever NS you need it to be, see https://www.wireguard.com/netns/#ordinary-containerization
You could also have the interface which WG needs to connect in its own namespace and move the wg interface out into whatever NS you need it to be, see https://www.wireguard.com/netns/#ordinary-containerization
1
2
0