SmithWillSuffice
@SmithWillSuffice@climatejustice.social
Mathematical physicist, macroeconomics activist, writer, volunteer for philanthropic NGO.
climatejustice.social
Replying to
@miketorr@mastodon.art
@miketorr@mastodon.art @schrotie@fosstodon.org
You will need a new branch for every configuration of woolen fibres down to the constituent quark (entanglement is qubit monogamous). And have a metaphysics where branches can re-merge. Total bollocks. ;-)
There is an infinitely (literally) more parsimonious explanation for entanglement, and it is spacetime topology. ER=EPR.