Random9

@benroyce@mastodon.social @Mastodon@mastodon.social it's so obvious, yet you can't just explain that. Instead you are talking shit trying to insult me

@benroyce@mastodon.social @Mastodon@mastodon.social ofc you are right.

@benroyce@mastodon.social @Mastodon@mastodon.social it's obvious only in your close minded bubble. It's sad that nobody told you that there are people that think differently than you. That's a typical of yankee that never saw a different country.

@benroyce@mastodon.social @Mastodon@mastodon.social Clearly only your shit that you can't even explain is not stupid. Everybody just should know that you opinions are the best and true

@benroyce@mastodon.social @Mastodon@mastodon.social I've explained why that's not good. You can't explain why it's good. The only conclusion is that you are just repeating someone's opinion. You've never engaged in critical thinking process yourself.

@benroyce@mastodon.social @Mastodon@mastodon.social yes, your opinions are the best, others suck. And that is not narcissist thing to say.

@benroyce@mastodon.social @Mastodon@mastodon.social you never said why removing an icon is a good thing to do. You just said it's good.

@benroyce@mastodon.social @Mastodon@mastodon.social anyway, you are the one entitled here, reserving the right to an opinion. The right opinion. I can't have other opinion, because you are tired of "complaining"? It's not an adult daycare bro. Who is masturbating their ego by explaining how good they are and others are wrong? Me?

@benroyce@mastodon.social @Mastodon@mastodon.social lmao, you are not my dad. Why do you care? I'm "complaining" about that one thing. Answer my question.

@benroyce@mastodon.social @Mastodon@mastodon.social you are making it personal for no reason. Explain to me what's good about removing an X icon?

@benroyce@mastodon.social @Mastodon@mastodon.social ok xD there is nothing good about what they did. They are not so stupid to fully remove an X account with almost 2 milion followers. They just removed one icon. Why? Why not all of the big tech platform icons? Because it's a virtue signaling - hey look, we don't like people with different opinions! Look how nice, diverse and inclusive we are! And they didn't just remove them. They announced it like it was meaningful change. It's not. That's why it's just virtue signaling. They don't have balls to delete the account. They project how "good" they are without doing the deed. Children's behavior.

@nixCraft@mastodon.social make the bubble pop ASAP, I was laid off and can't find anything for months.

@benroyce@mastodon.social @Mastodon@mastodon.social that's the weakness of the platform. We are dependent on the whims of the reddit moderators. But for some reason my angry appeal was accepted. Probably a mistake.

@benroyce@mastodon.social @Mastodon@mastodon.social what? XD

@benroyce@mastodon.social @Mastodon@mastodon.social they did something good? By removing an icon to X account to virtue signal? Give me a break.

@Mastodon@mastodon.social leaving bluesky and Facebook links is a giant hipocrisy.

@AliceStollmeyer@eupolicy.social bluesky is still american, but far left. Also LinkedIn, it's microslop, American Giga corpo. You still have work to do.

@Frischling@wehavecookies.social @david_chisnall@infosec.exchange no. Less eyes on every software means more vulnerabilies you never discover. It would be much worse. Diversity in this context is just another term to describe security by obscurity. We need less numer of standards that are more robust, not more standards.

@david_chisnall@infosec.exchange the most microslop shilling thing I've read today. Ofc microslop doesn't want one big competitor, but many small ones. Anyway, that is not true. All of the servers run on Linux for decades now. That was never the problem, but just now, when microslop is losing desktop market? Very curious indeed.

@kevinrothrock@infosec.exchange no wonder you don't have left comedians

@chlopmarcin@101010.pl to za mało, by przyciągnąć więcej ludzi. Ale to może być też zaleta. Debile zostają tam gdzie powinni, czyli na fejsie

@chlopmarcin@101010.pl no ja mam nadzieję, ale tego nie da się naprawić. Nawet jak software przestanie dawać możliwość banowania serwerów, to może to admin zrobić na poziomie sprzętu. Problem wynika z braku centralizacji i nigdy nie zniknie

@chlopmarcin@101010.pl Im dłużej używam, tym bardziej widzę dlaczego to nie ma szans. To po prostu nie działa za dobrze. Na serwerze, na którym jestem nie widać wiele kont, bo jest zablokowany. Na drugim polskim serwerze nie widać znowu innych kont, bo też jest zablokowany gdzieś. Jeden admin serwera może zdecydować, kto kogo może czytać, mocno przeszkadzając w przepływie informacji. Gdyby to chociaż chodziło tylko o brak możliwości komentowania. Przeciętny człowiek nie będzie się zastanawiał, dlaczego nie może obserwować jakiegoś konta. Nie będzie z tego korzystać.

@claesdevreese German left politicians aren't influential enough for anything to change.

@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org @JamesBaker@social.openrightsgroup.org that's the least important problem with this kind of law. Destruction of anonimity because some parents can't parent is more damaging imo.

@gamingonlinux@mastodon.social yea, it makes sense. I'm braindead

@gamingonlinux@mastodon.social has anyone ever modded a controller?

@Infrogmation Listen to the fbi kids: https://www.pcmag.com/news/fbi-recommends-installing-an-ad-blocker-to-dodge-scammers

@woe2you@beige.party @Kir@mastodon.uno @infobeautiful@vis.social yes, that land wouldn't be used in any other meaningful way. And those sheeps just eat grass. That kind of cherry picking in this graphic is not helping anybody.

@maxpool@mathstodon.xyz @pluralistic@mamot.fr I always try to buy a drm free version of a book I want to read. I visit Anna's archive if I fail. It's about 90% of English books and 0% for polish books. No polish ebook store has drm, apart from subscription based ones. We have it good here.

@streetartutopia destroying public property is not fighting. It's delinquency.