Professor in information law @ Institute for Information Law (IViR), University of Amsterdam, director AI, Media & Democracy Lab, user rights, algosoc program - public values in the algorithmic society
Professor in information law @ Institute for Information Law (IViR), University of Amsterdam, director AI, Media & Democracy Lab, user rights, algosoc program - public values in the algorithmic society
Posts
Professor in information law @ Institute for Information Law (IViR), University of Amsterdam, director AI, Media & Democracy Lab, user rights, algosoc program - public values in the algorithmic society
On Tuesday, 18/4, our @aim4dem@akademienl.social we will organise a panel on the use of generative AI in the news media, with leading thinkers in this emerging field, including @ndiakopoulos@hci.social Aimee Rinehart David Caswell @hannescools@mastodon.social and Mathias Felipe de Lima Santos . This is the second in our series, it will take place online and more details on how to participate can be found here: http://www.aim4dem.nl/events/
Professor in information law @ Institute for Information Law (IViR), University of Amsterdam, director AI, Media & Democracy Lab, user rights, algosoc program - public values in the algorithmic society
Who owns AI-generated content? Is it ok to train generative AI on other creators' content? Is there a role for competition law? Are prompts personal data? And when is generative AI high risk? Join us for a discussion in this first of a series of 3 discussions - with real people, for real people. @aim4dem@akademienl.social https://lnkd.in/emnubw-B
Professor in information law @ Institute for Information Law (IViR), University of Amsterdam, director AI, Media & Democracy Lab, user rights, algosoc program - public values in the algorithmic society
Is the vanity of Elon Musk a "systemic risk" in the sense of Art. 34 DSA (and if so, what can Twitter do to mitigate that risk)?
https://www.platformer.news/p/yes-elon-musk-created-a-special-system
Professor in information law @ Institute for Information Law (IViR), University of Amsterdam, director AI, Media & Democracy Lab, user rights, algosoc program - public values in the algorithmic society
Professor in information law @ Institute for Information Law (IViR), University of Amsterdam, director AI, Media & Democracy Lab, user rights, algosoc program - public values in the algorithmic society
If a film like M3GAN says anything about broader public perceptions of AI we still have a major job ahead in debunking & much needed digital common sense. And we should start with Hollywood! Seriously?! Movie industry, you can do better! (Interestingly, this was one of the rare cases where the audience was more sane than the critics 94 vs 78% on Rotten Tomatoes)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M3GAN
Professor in information law @ Institute for Information Law (IViR), University of Amsterdam, director AI, Media & Democracy Lab, user rights, algosoc program - public values in the algorithmic society
Designing thinking in law - different approaches being investigated in this workshop https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rossana-ducato_flyer-legal-design-roundtable-2023-activity-7024054450839289856-TFWV/?originalSubdomain=si
Much looking forward to learning more about the other projects, and presenting a scifi prototype on the potential implications of the AI Act on the media sector
Professor in information law @ Institute for Information Law (IViR), University of Amsterdam, director AI, Media & Democracy Lab, user rights, algosoc program - public values in the algorithmic society
Question to fellow AI Act folks out there: Did u also notice that the latest Council version dropped in the definition of user the non-professional exception ("except where the AI system is used in the course of a personal non-professional activity") from the original Art. 3(4). User is now "now any natural or legal person, including a public authority, agency or other body, under whose authority the system is used." Does that mean that end-users are included in the definition?