Jay Bazuzi

@BarneyDellar@mastodon.scot @qcoding@iosdev.space

Given a function like:

F()
{
a();
b();
if (c()) { d(); }
}

It makes sense to have test(s) for when `c` is true and other test(s) for when it's false.

But don't have some test(s) for the `a` effects and some test(s) for the `b` effects. If the `a` and `b` effects need to be verified, assert them both in the same test.

And yes: if this makes your tests undesirable in some way, refactor.

New unit testing rule just dropped:

Any two adjacent lines of code shall be verified by the exact same tests.

Most NFL teams are named for a city, e.g.: Seahawks, Browns, Cowboys, Bay Buccaneers.

Some are named after states: Titans, Vikings, Cardinals, Panthers, Jets, Giants, Commanders, City Chiefs.

Patriots are named after a country that doesn't exist. Ironic.

Micro USB in 2025 is a misdemeanor.

USB-C that requires a USB-A charger is a felony.