• Sign in
  • Sign up
Elektrine
EN
Log in Register
Modes
Overview Chat Timeline Communities Gallery Lists Friends Email Vault DNS VPN
Back to Timeline
  • Open on sh.itjust.works

FineCoatMummy

@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
lemmy 0.19.16
0 Followers
0 Following
Joined February 17, 2026

Posts

Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · 19h ago

They want to force the problem on the entire world, so they cant be held responsible.

Yah. On top of that, big tech cos often likes high regulatory burden. Ideally different between countries and jurisdictions. Big tech can afford compliance teams and w/e else they need. But! High regulatory burden is harder for upstart competitors. And very hard or impossible for tiny projects.

The same with technical burden. Like browser engines, used to be simple, now, extremely complex with wasm and webgl and stuff. There are only a few left standing. And some only barely.

The higher the burden, the more big tech is entrenched.

View full thread on sh.itjust.works
1
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · 19h ago

If you break them and report the bug you can be prosecuted under some hacking paragraph.

The old shoot the messenger approach!

We’ve had some high profile examples in the US too. Like this one, from 2021. A professor was investigated by governor Mike Parson of Missouri, for literally using View Page Source in a browser. And reporting a major vulnerability in good faith. I linked Parson’s wikipedia page, because he deserves his ridicule. Not for his ignorance! Many are ignorant of how the web works. That’s OK. He deserves ridicule for how he handled the episode. For dragging the professor’s name through the mud, who had only tried to help.

In the end, the governor received much ridicule. The investgation was dropped.

View full thread on sh.itjust.works
5
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · 1d ago

My concern in the long run is that over time the newer generations arent going to ever learn/know how freeing personal computing used to be.

Oh absolutely! It becomes normalized for those who never knew any other way.

I lucked out, my pa was a techie and got me steered towards the importance of tech freedom. Not everyone is so fortunate. Tech is almost an extension of our minds now. How we remember. How we learn. How we communicate. When we give away control of our devices to big tech, it’s like giving away control of our thoughts and emotions. Even our culture.

View full thread on sh.itjust.works
3
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · 2d ago

They allege it was to help protect accounts and personal data.

TBH it scares me that more and more things may go this way. You want online banking, or w/e? Well! You better use “trusted device”! What does “trusted device” mean? It means the device is locked down against its “owner”.

It’s like a relentless march where personal computing dies and corporate computing takes over. Ever more, our technology answers to big tech, not us.

View full thread on sh.itjust.works
24
2
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · 2d ago

its just getting vendors to actually do it.

Good ideas… and yeah… the browser vendors have a financial incentive to build mechanisms to collect anything and everything. Javascript itself exposes so much more fingerprinting possibilies.

That’s also why I think it’s so terrible for Google’s Chrome to have like practically all the market share. G can now drive the whole web in a way that’s good for them and bad for us.

View full thread on sh.itjust.works
2
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · 2d ago

Article talks about cookies still being set when user opts out of those.

That’s bad, sure. But TBH I worry so much more about fingerprinting. Cookies, easy to delete in your browser, easy to block. Fingerprinting is done behind the scenes on the server, you can’t block their attempt to. There are “resist fingerprinting” options in some browsers now like firefox, but limited in effect, and much of the fingerpinting is not even something the browser can stop. Things like TLS fingerprints, or exact timings between your system making a request, and the serving system. Or things you can spoof but which cause problems if you do. Even Tor Browser doesn’t spoof some of those things b/c it causes problems to do.

The identity broker companies have a massive financial incentive, and they employ very smart data scientists. Even “opting out” of cookies, I think it’s about 0% chance we have any way to opt out of these behind the scene techniques they use. They will use every shitty weasely trick in the book like the slimeweasels they are.

View full thread on sh.itjust.works
23
4
0
0
Open post
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works in privacy · 4d ago

Closing the Data Broker Loophole

I found this, it’s about the data broker loophole. The problem is, in the US we have 4th Amendment protection against warantless searches. Many other nations, have a similar right, by another name. Canada has Section 8 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

These are more and more bypassed by data brokers. The government purchases data from data brokers. Data it could not get without a warant in the past.

Maybe this is not as much a problem yet in Canada as in the US? I’m not sure, hope some Canadians can say how it is? But here in the US, it’s a massive prob now.

Related: We Built a Surveillance State: What Now?

View on sh.itjust.works
We Built a Surveillance State. What Now?
www.pogo.org

We Built a Surveillance State. What Now?

For decades, Republicans and Democrats have greenlit a massive surveillance apparatus. What happens when this powerful tool is in the hands of the wrong person?

42
2
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · 4d ago
XMPP with encryption extensions (OMEMO) You can easily host a server yourself, no big tech. It's light weight. Open standard so lots of client to pick from, no lockin. Supports sending pictures, videos if you want.
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
1
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Apr 04, 2026
Agree. Also it creates a false dichotomy in peoples minds. If you fight the orwellian creep into every kind of tech, you must not care about the children! What kind of sociopath is against protecting children!! Really, I do believe there are many parts of the world children should be protected from. But NOT by giving away our freedom. NOT by turning the world into one huge mass survielance device. NOT by going full 1984. I can be in favor of protecting children even if I object to dragnet surveilance.
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
3
1
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Apr 04, 2026
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
1
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Apr 04, 2026

100% mobile app based public transport, meaning that there is no way of buying or showing a ticket unless it’s the app

Wow. That’s awful. How does it work for poor people who can’t afford a phone to run the app?

Where I live the city buses still accept cash. But I don’t know for how much longer.

I try to get everyone of my friends to pay for everythng with cash. Food, buses, restaurants. Just to support the privacy option, so we don’t lose it. But they think payment apps are more convenient so they don’t listen, lol.

View full thread on sh.itjust.works
3
1
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Mar 28, 2026
Yah, there might be something to that. For protection against style + vocab matching. It sucks though. I recently read where the more people use LLM assisters when they write, the more the whole virtual commons grows bland. It feeds back upon itself. Sigh. I just want a world where we can have nice things. And assholes don't try to ruin the nice things we could have.
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
19
0
0
0
Open post
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works in privacy · Mar 28, 2026

Large-scale online deanonymization with LLMs

Paper by,

Simon Lermen, Daniel Paleka, Joshua Swanson, Michael Aerni, Nicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr

It talks about deanonymizing those who writes under a pseudonym. Sites like reddit, lemmy would be that type.

From the paper,

Given two databases of pseudonymous individuals, each containing unstructured text written by or about that individual, we implement a scalable attack pipeline that uses LLMs to: (1) extract identity-relevant features, (2) search for candidate matches via semantic embeddings, and (3) reason over top candidates to verify matches and reduce false positives.

Our results show that the practical obscurity protecting pseudonymous users online no longer holds and that threat models for online privacy need to be reconsidered.

They can match writing styles, interests, details to infer a job or city, or other unstructured information. That allows to match unrelated pseudonyms to the same person. Like, FooFighterGroupie and Yolanda43905 are the same human, despite they never said it. It can allow also, to match a pseudonym to a real identity across sites. Like someone posted on LinkedIn with a real name. It takes less info than most people expect, to figure out Julia Greenberg of Cedarville, NH is FooFighterGroupie.

You can protect yourself by never giving away much info. But ofc sometimes that’s the whole point! Think talking about specific hobbies or w/e, gives away info. Also change up writing styles + vocab use, b/c it is a unique fingerprint.

I doubt this technique is used in a dragnet way… YET! But no reason it can’t scale, if the cost of resources goes low eonugh. We could eventually see it become standard, analysis to link people across sites and identities.

View on sh.itjust.works
77
18
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Mar 26, 2026
Agree. Another benefit is, it's much less productive to use info-warfare bots against a small forum of let's say 500 users, than against a global site with 1B users.
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
4
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Mar 26, 2026
Agree, hard indeed. Any solution will have problems. False positives. False negatves. Violating privacy. So far, maybe Lemmy flew under the radar and it's a nice enough place. But I don't see how that can continue longterm. It is sad to me. Anything nice eventually gets ruined.
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
4
2
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Mar 22, 2026

Friends and family will be so excited for you and optimistically update your address in there phone book.

Oh yes! I have experienced this already! They put it in their contacts and then every sketch weather app and recipe app scrapes it. My friends are kind and well meaning, but hey have no idea how the information economy works. They do not understand how much data they are giving away about themselves but abotu me too!

have an attorney list his name for all utilities

That is what Michel Bazzel talks about too in his book, but it seems like this is difficult to find someone to do that. And it makes other kinds of things difficult too, if the residence is not tied to your name. I have had cases where I had to supply a “utility bill” tying my real name to my residence, in order to get some other kind of service I needed, or part of KYC.

I fear you are right about the difficulty of this. I don’t think it is exactly impossible. But very difficult, for sure!

View full thread on sh.itjust.works
3
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Mar 22, 2026
Thank you for this. I am glad to hear you had success! I do most of those, but not so far number 4. I don't know about utilities though. I believe that my current power company sells their customer lists, because I get junk mail at a misspelling of my name on file with them. Did you have any trouble with moving companies? I didn't move since the "surveillance economy". It is hard for me to imagine moving companies wouldn't capitalize on selling your new address where they had to deliver. I have also heard that it is better not to file a change of address form with the post office. Instead to change the address on file with your charge card companies or banks directly.
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
2
1
0
0
Open post
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works in privacy · Mar 21, 2026

Moving and keeping home addy private?

I’m sorry, this topic is kinda USA centric. At least the details. Maybe not the core idea though. For the non-USA readers, KYC = know your customer.

I am soon to move to a new home for a job xfer. I wish I could do it privately. I had a stalker who broke into my home. I am still apprehensive and tense even though it was years ago. It feels impossible to move privately 😠

I know about Michael Bazzel’s Privacy books, and I have read over them. They are good and I follow his advize for some things. I still feel overwhelmed and don’t think I can manage it by myself. One problem is, the last edition of the Privacy book was years ago. KYC is in many more places now. Like utilities and services you need when moving to a new home. I run into more things that demand a copy of a gov photo ID or they will not give you a service. This data makes toward the credit bureaus, they always learn. It used to be you could pay for utilities from an LLC, but that often triggers a KYC check now and sometimes they want to copy your ID.

I already try to fight my addy appearing in people search sites but that is hard. There are so many of them. Some outside the USA and do not follow takedown requests.

There must be ways to do this! Maybe they are only available to the rich and famous? I am not rich or famous, lol. But I am middle class and would spend a moderate sum for a service to handle this. I do not feel I can do it on my own. Maybe I could years ago before so many attacks on privacy, but no more.

Has anyone successfully moved AND kept a new home addy private from data brokers? Did you use a service or company to help?

View on sh.itjust.works
30
10
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works in privacy · Mar 07, 2026
Granted I didn’t use it to create my account I bet that’s like 90% of what they care about tho. They really want to ID you when you first sign up, but they might care not as much about day to day use. It’s fuzzier with reddit tho. Used to be you could sign up with a VPN with success. Some still have accts made like that. They are much sticklier now. It maybe possible but just rarely, and nobody seems to know what makes the diff. It also used to be posible to sign up with Tor, but today that’s instant shadowban. My side rant is that shadowbans are MF-ing evil. I got caught in one because I used a VPN to sign up. I only ever tried to answer people on a tech help sub. I was posting in good faith. Tried to be helpful and contribute to the community. But none of my posts were ever being engaged with. No upvotes, no downvotes, no replies. Finally I looked without being signed in (“open in private window”) and sure enough… nobody but me could see my posts. It felt bad, man. I put my time and effort into trying to help other people, for nothing.
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
3
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works in privacy · Mar 07, 2026
It’s very difficult to not be truly unique if someone out there is purposefully tracking you as an individual. And the neat part about that is… it used to be very expensive to do it. Now it blew right on through free, and into highly profitable. So it can be done to everyone everywhere at every moment. No one knows how many people the Nazis employed to spy on the rest. Some estimates are like 1/4 of the population spied on the others! Today? We can put that to shame using only 0.01% or w/e of our population to spies on the rest. B/c that 0.01% has surveilance tools unimaginably powerful compared to anything the Nazis dreamed about. There is a place in the world for targeted surveilance of bad people, mass murders, drug kingpins, w/e. You get a judge to sign off, and go to town. But *dragnet *surveilance of everyone at all times erodes the foundation of free societies.
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
3
2
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works in privacy · Mar 05, 2026
Frankly humanity does not need this invention one bit. Yah. Unfortunately, we’ve got it though. :( :( :( People I know, some friends, they are completely oblivious to how much it will surveillance them. Or how much Meta already does, in other ways. “I don’t care, I’m not doing anything wrong”. Constant surveillance erodes a society. It erodes democracy.
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
0
2
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Feb 25, 2026
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
1
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Feb 24, 2026

People are on places where many other people are

More on that idea here: Network effect

It’s a reason so many big tech companies hate interoperability. Without interoperability you get locked into their system. Then they can enshittify their service to extreme levels, and you are trapped.

Unfortunately there is a harmful incentive structure. The more abusive a service is, the more money it makes from its malicious but profitable aspects which we all know. Meanwhile less harmful services struggle because they lack the monetization stream.

View full thread on sh.itjust.works
13
3
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Feb 20, 2026
Oh, nice. Canada & USA have cooperated closely for a long time on regulations for cars, so manufacturers only need minor tweaks to sell into both markets. Hopefully that'll help.
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
2
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Feb 20, 2026
Oh, I see. I thought maybe I did it by accident somehow! I bike everywhere when I can. I'll join the fuckcars group, now that I know about it.
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
2
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Feb 19, 2026
I'm pretty new to Lemmy and noticed that my post was crossposted to fuckcars and privacy@programming.dev. I have no problem with that, but I didn't do it on purpose!
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
6
6
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Feb 19, 2026
I mostly agree. But sometimes if a single jurisdiction gets regulation in place, it can be cheaper for companies to produce a single model to comply with all of them, rather than make multiple models. Even if they do make multiple models, it still means there is a supply of privacy-spec cars. California in the USA has been more privacy friendly than most states. If California would crank up some car privacy regs, maybe work with the Europeans and Canada on a common legal standard, that is a huge foot in the door! It means people in other US states could buy a California-spec car. If the momentum builds enough, maybe companies would say screw it and sell the privacy-spec cars everywhere. That happened in the past with car safety regs. It went from auto companies whining about it, to the same companies featuring it as a selling point. Look how well our cars do in crash tests! I agree car privacy is going to be a hard fight. Auto companies will fight *dirty* to avoid privacy regs. But we can push on this. A groundswell of public support can't hurt.
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
14
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Feb 19, 2026

They could have made it a lot cheaper as a coupe.

Maybe if it sees market success, they’ll branch out into other body styles. I want a car too, not a truck.

View full thread on sh.itjust.works
13
1
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Feb 19, 2026

have joked … that if I have to buy a new vehicle I am ripping the whole dashboard out.

Desperate times call for desperate measures.

View full thread on sh.itjust.works
12
0
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Feb 19, 2026

Slate seems to be the only brand currently that intends to deliver vehicles with zero connectivity required.

Do you mean these guys? That’s the first I heard of them so thank you for that! I thought it would turn out to be a European make, but they’re on my side of the pond. A zero-connectivity electric car would be the dream. I like the idea of electric cars but so far they have all been even more wrapped up in telematics than internal combustion cars.

View full thread on sh.itjust.works
22
15
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Feb 19, 2026

And if you reconnect to get them, there’s no guarantee your car doesn’t suddenly dump all your personal data obtained in the meantime onto company servers.

It’s a good point. Also I wonder if OBD-II can do that. A person could disable the port, but that may make it hard / impossible to get the vehicle serviced.

View full thread on sh.itjust.works
6
1
0
0
Open post
In reply to
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Feb 19, 2026
For sure. We're in a difficult place. Arguably the ultimate solution has to be regulatory, but we don't have that yet. All we have is whatever the community can figure out on its own. The more surveillance gets integrated into complex automotive systems, the less approch-able it is for average people to yank a fuse or unscrew an antenna coupler.
View full thread on sh.itjust.works
9
0
0
0
Open post
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
FineCoatMummy
FineCoatMummy
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
sh.itjust.works
@FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works · Feb 19, 2026
Many of us know how bad modern cars are for privacy. Yet many of our friends and neighbors do not realize how intrusive it really is. I linked a blog entry from Mozilla’s investigation about car privacy. In that blog is a link to their make-by-make analysis. The amount of very intimate information a modern car collects is honestly appalling. It includes health data, real time mood information, weight gain or loss, and so on. And it does so even for passengers. The web has many resources talking about this problem, but almost no resources on what to do about it. I know the simple thing is to say, “just drive an old car bro!” That’s fine if you can, but not everyone can. Also it has drawbacks like more maintenance. Sometimes less safety if it’s older than certain safety features. For the purpose of this thread, it is more interesting to focus on newer, surveillance enabled cars which are the majority of what people drive on the road today. Some people have figured out how to bypass the surveillance package on some cars. One way is to uncouple the antenna it uses to phone home. Other times you can bypass the telematics module or remove a fuse that powers it. I feel like we really need a central model by model repository of information. Past that, how do we prove it has worked, if we do it? Has anyone reading this tried to use an RF detector to see if their car is still trying to phone home, after they have bypassed telematics? What are your experiences? I want to buy one and use it to test my own car, but the info on the web seems sketch.
View on sh.itjust.works
‘Privacy Nightmare on Wheels’:  Every Car Brand Reviewed By Mozilla — Including Ford, Volkswagen and Toyota — Flunks Privacy Test
Mozilla Foundation

‘Privacy Nightmare on Wheels’: Every Car Brand Reviewed By Mozilla — Including Ford, Volkswagen and

Mozilla’s latest edition of *Privacy Not Included reveals how 25 major car brands collect and share deeply personal data, including sexual activity, facial expressions, and genetic and health informat

237
62
1
0
313k7r1n3

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • FAQ

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • VPN Policy

Email Settings

IMAP: mail.elektrine.com:993

POP3: pop3.elektrine.com:995

SMTP: mail.elektrine.com:465

SSL/TLS required

Support

  • support@elektrine.com
  • Report Security Issue

Connect

Tor Hidden Service

khav7sdajxu6om3arvglevskg2vwuy7luyjcwfwg6xnkd7qtskr2vhad.onion
© 2026 Elektrine. All rights reserved. • Server: 17:14:01 UTC