Thread context
2 posts in path
Parent
@YellowTurtle@todon.eu
Open
on todon.eu
Open ancestor post
Dialecticians, unlike logicians recognise proofs that contradict hypothetical methods ground on reductionist presuppositions.
universeodon.com
Dialecticians, unlike logicians recognise proofs that contradict hypothetical methods ground on reductionist presuppositions.
universeodon.com
@Dialectician@universeodon.com
·
Mar 09, 2026
@YellowTurtle@todon.eu Suppose no thing, which is put together is nothing, is absolute, so implies being is not absolute. Why should an idea be synonymous with what being is; why are the values of the ideas’ concept not absolute? When absolute values are presupposed, as in merely affirmed according to beliefs e.g. the geocentric model of the cosmos is true, which is actually false, they do not transcend their actual values if science is objective. By that I mean its claims can be independently verified and are not dependent on the beliefs in them. Ideas, having not just a form but being the exposition of the concept, transcend being e.g. the cosmos is infinite in time and or space as opposed to the values of the reasons for its dimensions are. #Philosophy
The dialectic is not linear in that its principle is constituted by the comprehension of contradictions, which are real, not transcendental e.g. as there are exceptions to speculative claims on modality that are spurious, as in without proof e.g. it is necessary that there are no absolutes, as nothing is absolute. #Dialectic #Hegel #TheAbsoluteIdea #TheScienceOfLogic
View full thread on universeodon.com