Daniel Buschek

Typical chatbots force co-writers to leave shared docs. Our #CHI2026 paper explores collaborative AI use in shared docs via 3 features:
🤖 Shared agent profiles
☑️ Repeatable tasks, triggered by users or system
💬 Agents respond in shared comments
Preprint in 🧵
w @florianlehmann@hci.social

📢 Looking for current research on #HCI + #AI? Here's a categorised collection of 300+ #CHI2026 preprints, collected via arXiv:
https://dbuschek.medium.com/chi26-preprint-collection-bdbfe9492a7b

Finalising your #CHI2026 revision? Or suffering from not being allowed to do so? I've "reviewed-to-reject" one of our papers with ChatGPT, to show how this leads to bad reviews - and give ideas for responding to this: https://dbuschek.medium.com/dont-review-with-an-llm-laundry-list-method-486028b01668

Have we lost peer appreciation? 🤔 Not just at #CHI2026 I notice many review-to-reject. All studies have tradeoffs, all papers have limited scope. Sure, reviewing is fast, even with "passing knowledge", if we list what isn't there and conclude it's lacking. But we should review what *has* been done.

Whether you're new or a seasoned reviewer, I highly recommend Ken Hinckley's article on excellence in reviews - and championing papers: https://kenhinckley.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/excellence-in-reviews-mobilehci-2015-web-site.pdf

Three weeks ago, my feed filled with Grammarly ads - and I wondered: What if we took their messages seriously? My anecdotal "ad-vestigation" connects them to Human-AI interaction concepts, leading to counterfactual questions for alternative design directions. https://medium.com/p/1bab97d0fa98

#HCI #AI #LLM #Writing

While reviewing for #CHI2026, I've noticed four new writing issues in #HCI papers, likely due to an increased use of #LLMs / #AI. I describe them here - and how to fix them: https://dbuschek.medium.com/when-llms-write-our-papers-1cc746373cd0

Is this average based on data or a nudge? 😄 #chi2026

💡 It's #CHI writing season again, so time to repost my 10 practical tips on how to write better discussion sections: https://medium.com/p/be851092f351
Happy writing! #HCI #CHI2026 #CHI2025

Our article on the "AI Ghostwriter Effect" is the top editor's pick in today's email by #ACM on the rising impact factor of #TOCHI - cool! 🤩
Available here (open access): https://doi.org/10.1145/3637875

@florianlehmann@hci.social @robin_welsch@fediscience.org

For #CHI we can submit a revised version after initial reviews. In contrast, it now feels bad to write a #UIST rebuttal without being able to directly show changes. I wonder if reviewers will feel the same way and if that reduces the chances of seriously engaging with rebuttals. 🤔

Help me improve my lecture: What's one idea/concept/paper/system I should include in a session on interaction/UIs for human-AI co-creation? (Feel free to self-promote your own work!) 🤩 #HCI #AI #IUI

📢 Looking for current research on #HCI + #AI? Here's a collection of 200+ #CHI2025 preprints, collected via arXiv and your suggestions: https://medium.com/human-centered-ai/chi25-preprint-collection-7c8a8711e2ca

📢 Update on my list: The #HCI + #AI preprint collection now lists about 200 #CHI2024 papers! 🤩

Thank you all for sharing, further suggestions welcome!

https://medium.com/human-centered-ai/chi24-preprint-collection-hci-ai-0caac4b0b798

📢 Looking for current research on #HCI + #AI? Here's a collection of 100+ #CHI2023 preprints. As in the last years, I've collected them via arXiv and twitter - and now also mastodon. Suggestions welcome!

https://dbuschek.medium.com/chi23-preprint-collection-hci-ai-53e8a89de156