Open post CCRodgers @CCRodgers@mastodon.social · 14mo ago Replying to @ExtinctionR@social.rebellion.global @ExtinctionR@social.rebellion.global So Teflon, move over!
Open post CCRodgers @CCRodgers@mastodon.social · 14mo ago Replying to @Noupside@saturation.social <p>Spoiler: there’s no treasonous conspiracy .</p><p>I read every word of the Gabbard Files so you don’t have to. The arguments — when compared to the evidence, timelines, 3 prior investigations, and 3 prior meta-investigations — indicate either breathtakingly bad faith or astonishingly low reading comprehension. You decide.</p><p><a href="https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/from-russian-interference-to-revisionist-innuendo--what-the-gabbard-files-actually-say" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">lawfaremedia.org/article/from-</span><span class="invisible">russian-interference-to-revisionist-innuendo--what-the-gabbard-files-actually-say</span></a></p> @Noupside Regarding Whether Tulsi Gabbard's case against Obama "indicate either breathtakingly bad faith or astonishingly low reading comprehension" -- couldn't both be true?