Scientist Jumped head first from the ivory tower cryo-Electron Microscopy && HPC aficionado Born 344 ppm OpenAccess (mostly) Free Software
Scientist
Jumped head first from the ivory tower
cryo-Electron Microscopy &&
HPC aficionado
Born 344 ppm
OpenAccess (mostly) Free Software
Posts
Scientist Jumped head first from the ivory tower cryo-Electron Microscopy && HPC aficionado Born 344 ppm OpenAccess (mostly) Free Software
trying to explain my proton mail address like “yeah like the subatomic particle” … crickets
Scientist Jumped head first from the ivory tower cryo-Electron Microscopy && HPC aficionado Born 344 ppm OpenAccess (mostly) Free Software
one of the most attractive parts of moving to Hawai'i may be the several persons confirmed… it’s so far away from the mainland bullshit that you can breath a bit
I don’t love the idea of “running away” but at some point it really boils down to self preservation
Scientist Jumped head first from the ivory tower cryo-Electron Microscopy && HPC aficionado Born 344 ppm OpenAccess (mostly) Free Software
A pretty common explanation for bots being good at code is tied to the large open source corpus they (largely pirated) trained on.
After a few weeks of using claude code to build a system that helps the llm/harness plan and maintain alignment to my intent, i can confidently say, that bitch fell on the head.
I think LLMs are good code because code has structured intent. Predicting next words is def useful for using tools, and when you can lean on an AST, you can “”reason””. But try to get a bot to even format a coherent question much less understand a positive or negative control. Nope.
Scientist Jumped head first from the ivory tower cryo-Electron Microscopy && HPC aficionado Born 344 ppm OpenAccess (mostly) Free Software
i think the number of hours i’ve spent sitting on a 5gal bucket in my life says enough
Scientist Jumped head first from the ivory tower cryo-Electron Microscopy && HPC aficionado Born 344 ppm OpenAccess (mostly) Free Software
I just had a lawn care stop by, thought hey nice they provided a detailed chemical sheet.
Just emailed them 3 corrections. Yeesh
“
Ty, i appreciate the handout.
Tenacity, entirely wrong:
- listed as ethylene glycol
- mesotrione is correct (your online sheet has this right)
Dylox:
- listed as Triclofluron
- correct is trichlorfon
Arkon vs Pyrimisulfan (trade and common flipped)
There’s a few other small typos but not that change the chemical identity.
Cheers,
Ben
“
Scientist Jumped head first from the ivory tower cryo-Electron Microscopy && HPC aficionado Born 344 ppm OpenAccess (mostly) Free Software
I’m looking for a corner of the fedi that i could actually engage with on “ai” without dealing with all the haters. I get it i hear you and if you are in that camp, drop what you would want to see in a content warning.
Shit posts like:
- man opus 4.7 really loves the load-bearing comment. I’ll give you a load to bury robot
- it’s wild to watch internal reasoning remark on how odd it is that the user view design docs as if it were code. Having a tool that is entirely predicated on natural language bitching about the importance of natural language
And probably some more actual use case discussions too, lol
Scientist Jumped head first from the ivory tower cryo-Electron Microscopy && HPC aficionado Born 344 ppm OpenAccess (mostly) Free Software
Scientist Jumped head first from the ivory tower cryo-Electron Microscopy && HPC aficionado Born 344 ppm OpenAccess (mostly) Free Software
Scientist Jumped head first from the ivory tower cryo-Electron Microscopy && HPC aficionado Born 344 ppm OpenAccess (mostly) Free Software