The defense contends that causing "anger, alarm, or resentment"—the standard cited in the disorderly conduct statute—is insufficient to criminalize speech under the First Amendment.
This just keeps getting worse the more I look into it lmfao, I hear speech that causes me all three of those on a daily fucking basis. So fucking what? All three are subjective as fuck and far more importantly there is no way in hell that could ever be applied equally to everyone. Fucking christmas music (especially before december) is "fighting words" and illegal under that vague a justification for killing 1A. The media's entire business model is literally causing anger/alarm/resentment on an hourly basis ffs.
Let that one truly sink in for a minute. The jury is deciding whether or not an 8 year old nigger was likely to attack her over harmless words. Talk about "victim blaming" holy fuck lmfao.
"Disorderly conduct", I'd saying letting your pet monkey steal shit from strangers is way more fucking disorderly. That's what started everything that happened. When's the dad's trial?