Conversation (9)
Showing 5 of 9 cached locally.
4 comments are reported by the remote server but not cached here yet
Open reply Open reply
Caleb James DeLisle
@cjd@pkteerium.xyz · Mar 25
"Enemy Combatants" isn't an HONEST designation for anyone who is not either physically fighting, or directly physically supporting the ones that are.
You can play word games to make words mean what you want them to mean, this is what THEY do all of the time, but deluding yourself is not going to help you.
And it doesn't really matter, what's actually important is how to impose pain on those who are causing you problems. And assassination warfare against the support infrastructure of a regime is highly effective.
This is because there are SO MANY support personnel that securing all of them is unrealistic, and they are all terrified of risk, so the terror aspect will be a force multiplier.
Kulak speaks about this point at length: https://www.anarchonomicon.com/p/assassination-war-and-the-death-of

Assassination War & the Death of Bureaucracy
Will Deshauna Stand and Receive Fire?
https://www.anarchonomicon.com/p/assassination-war-and-the-death-of
Open reply Open reply
SpookyPacheFriend 🎃
@SuperSnekFriend@poa.st · Mar 25
@RMIV
It should be added: This includes all departments, all agencies, and all contractors. No exception! It doesn't matter an employee doesn't belong to the higher risk groups like the federal law enforcement agencies, intelligence, or military
0
0
0
Open reply Open reply
WhitestTemplar
@WhitestTemplar@poa.st · Mar 25
Wow, Mason was right this whole time. Gonna go redact my local mailman.
0
2
0