Elektrine lite

← Feed

@Metaph@dragon.style

Post #620098

2026-03-10 06:51 UTC

So if you're evaluating whether to commission or pay an artist, and you're uncertain whether they are AI, the most surefire way to make that determination is to ask the artist about their medium and their process. There is not an artist in the world that isn't happy to talk about their medium. If they're cagey about that, easy red flag. If you're evaluating whether to favorite, comment, or engage with an artist on some level that doesn't directly involve exchanging money, the stakes are lower; you can still ask about the medium if you want, but like. If you don't have the time or energy or desire to have that conversation with every artist you engage with, and there's some art that you're on the fence about, I promise you, I PROMISE YOU, the engagement, the encouragement, the share, means THE WORLD to the artist if they're real, while withholding that engagement from an AI user really will not be felt by the prime movers of the AI world. If 5% of the time you accidentally engage with AI art, that's still 95% of the time that you're actively encouraging and helping real artists get noticed in a sea of talent and an ocean of slop. That means everything. Put another way: accidentally refusing to engage (or worse, encouraging others to refuse to engage) with a real artist based on arcane pattern-seeking and hunches that it might be AI is *far more damaging* to real artists than it is to AI and frankly, probably more damaging to them than AI itself. You don't need to have a perfect success rate at AI detection. Support real artists by engaging with them instead of being so afraid of AI that you make it harder for them. It's gonna be okay. Connection and engagement is both the purpose of art and the best weapon we have against generative AI, and that is frankly great news for artists.

Replies (3)

  • @Metaph all very true, but you got a big laugh out of me with that point about how excited artists are to discuss their process

    Open ##1260595

  • @ravelin@mindly.social 2026-03-10 14:33

    @Metaph yikes, the content tag made me think you had posted AI art! I'm glad I clicked through to see you were just discussing it!

    Open ##1260602

  • @Owlor@meow.social 2026-03-10 16:57

    @Metaph I've heard from editors that this is true about writing too, the easiest way to find out if a story is AI generated is to ask the author questions about character motivations or story decisions, there basically isn't a real author who isn't excited to talk your ear off about their characters and setting and why they wrote what they did. Now, what you absolutely shouldn't do is try to sleuth out whether the artist is using AI on your own and then start accusing them on it based on a hunch. There's basically nothing more annoying than that. I think the fundamental problem is that people are so used to seeing art decontextualized from the artist that it doesn't even occur to them to try an approach that is based on checking sources. Like, a lot of the time, you don't even have to ask artists about their process, you just go to their blog or social media feed and you'll see them talk about it in great detail.

    Open ##1260603