Elektrine lite

← Feed

@ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net

Post #522841

2026-02-25 07:46 UTC

Yes, because battery technology stagnated years ago… Oh wait

Replies (6)

  • @Frozentea725@feddit.uk 2026-02-25 08:06

    Great response, people just love to parrot easy dismissals without looking and the sheer magnitude on innovation and commercialisation going on in this sector

    Open ##523773

  • @Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2026-02-25 09:25

    TBF, there are a lot of “battery breakthroughs” that turn out to just be hot air. Battery technology had made tremendous progress though and there is still a lot of room for improvement.

    Open ##526847

  • @henfredemars@infosec.pub 2026-02-25 12:26

    Wow! Thanks for sharing that data. I had no idea.

    Open ##1567046

  • @CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 2026-02-25 14:02

    Weird, I didn't know Lithium-Ion batteries were still in the lab. I thought for sure we were using those already. I thought the batteries in the labs were various solid-state batteries like graphene or like this sodium-ion battery, where there's been a rise in patents around it but not a lot delivered ![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/15743bf1-afd6-4bf1-99f2-91c02c88cb5a.png)

    Open ##1567047

  • @Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-02-25 18:27

    I mean the first diagram is effectively useless without knowledge of battery density. They as well could compare the 2010 compacts with 2025s SUVs which have probably 2x the amount of total capacity. For the other charts: Agreed.

    Open ##1567048

  • @SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2026-02-25 13:26

    All that data says is batteries got cheaper so they are putting more of them into cars. Also 100 to 300 wh/kg is in labs. No explanation why it went from 175 to 100 Wh/kg 08-10.

    Open ##1567049