Post #496410
2026-03-02 21:35 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@Username85920@lemmy.ml 2026-03-03 06:41
Hardened browsers prioritize security over privacy right ? Vanadium is that kind of browser ?
-
@Imaginary_Stand4909@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2026-03-03 21:14
If you’re looking for something to use with actual accounts (like banking), use hardened Firefox (with arkenfox) or a hardened chromium browser. Neither Mullvad Browser nor LibreWolf (and especially NOT Tor) are designed for that use case. I wonder if my one bank doesn’t like Librewolf. I logged in no issue on Ungoogled Chromium, but got a “security warning” on LW. Meanwhile Discover doesn’t give a fuck and works when it wants to on either. Paypal worked fine on LW. I do use a Banking container on LW and turn off VPN, but banks are making it harder to go no app…
-
@ken@discuss.tchncs.de 2026-03-07 00:13
LibreWolf, on the other hand, works by spoofing a different fingerprint every session. Is that true? I think it’s not that much of a fundamental difference in strategy as you say. While LW (like MB) does randomization of e.g. WebGL and Canvas fingerprints, in general other fingerprintables are also kept static. From my perspective it’s more a difference in degrees than direction. Have you checked how your font fingerprint persist? I believe both Mullvad Browser and LibreWolf come with uBlockOrigin pre-installed Not exactly. LW comes without the addon but is configured to download and install uBlock Origin from addons.mozilla.org the very first thing it does. This is in contrast with Mullvad Browser (which does bundle the addon) and Konform Browser (which will load locally installed system uBO from known path if installed from distribution package manager). If you’re looking for something to use with actual accounts (like banking), use hardened Firefox (with arkenfox) or a hardened chromium browser. Konform Browser is intended to support that use-case and also worthy for consideration. Would be curious to hear if you agree or how you think it falls short!