2026-09-28 22:16 UTC
@alexchapman@vee.seedy.cc @dansup@mastodon.social LLMs generate code faster, we all agree right? Thus it results in more for humans to review.
“Coding by hand” is just coding. Just like writing.
You want to use LLMs for your own stuff? No one is stopping you. You’re lobbying for others to have to accept code that you didn’t even write. That’s a big difference.
It’s a joke that being anti-AI is extreme. LLMs weren’t even a thing until recently. There’s no reason that people should immediately have to accept them.
Replies (3)
-
@alexchapman@vee.seedy.cc 2026-09-28 22:19
@jzb@hachyderm.io I believe that KDE made the right decision where it doesn't matter how the code was made, whether it was from an LLM, manually written in Notepad++ or another editor, or even written with pen and paper and then scanned into the computer and then converted to the right file. As long as the quality of the code is good and not just a one shot and done type of thing, then the way it was generated is irrelevant. @dansup@mastodon.social
-
@Abstract_Mage_Annastasia@tech.lgbt 2026-09-28 23:10
@jzb@hachyderm.io @alexchapman@vee.seedy.cc @dansup@mastodon.social "but think of the productivity"
-
@matthewcroughan@social.defenestrate.it 2026-09-29 06:31
Then they say "you will be left behind", but I was already behind! Nothing lost, nothing gained.