Post #4383242
2026-08-04 21:05 UTC
@mttaggart@infosec.exchange My bad on my assumptions. Sorry for that, maybe I didn’t pay enough attention.
About the weapon, I think it’s an overly simplistic metaphor.
Duty of care? Well, ok, what about caring about the colleagues that are being fired because of “productivity gains” which is basically slop at scale?
Using the weapon? The more you use the weapon the more you ruin things for you and for others. I don’t know man.
Replies (1)
-
@mttaggart@infosec.exchange 2026-08-04 21:09
@chroma@raccoonisland.social Those are important concerns, but they are orthogonal to the immediate scenario. I'm being attacked. I have a tool that can materially improve defense. Whether I use it or don't in that moment has much less bearing on "productivity gains" or corporate strategy. It might make the difference between stopping and attack in time or not. That doesn't discount the concerns you address, but it does highlight the difference of scale that duty of care speaks to. If I am responsible for defense, is my obligation to make the best defense a de facto requirement to use that tool?