Post #4383239

@chroma@raccoonisland.social Those are important concerns, but they are orthogonal to the immediate scenario. I'm being attacked. I have a tool that can materially improve defense. Whether I use it or don't in that moment has much less bearing on "productivity gains" or corporate strategy. It might make the difference between stopping and attack in time or not. That doesn't discount the concerns you address, but it does highlight the difference of scale that duty of care speaks to. If I am responsible for defense, is my obligation to make the best defense a de facto requirement to use that tool?