@zackwhittaker@mastodon.social
Post #4275779
2026-07-31 10:47 UTC
Replies (7)
-
@jaark@infosec.exchange 2026-07-31 10:49
@zackwhittaker@mastodon.social Surely there should be criminal proceedings, never mind just sueing.
-
@neurovagrant@masto.deoan.org 2026-07-31 10:49
@zackwhittaker@mastodon.social can't wait until it happens to a defense contractor
-
@nbailey@mstdn.ca 2026-07-31 12:52
@zackwhittaker@mastodon.social I guess CFAA and all compliance rules go out the window as soon as an LLM is involved... Good to know, surely an auditor will feel the same way. And maybe a jury if we're lucky
-
@OvertonDoors@infosec.exchange 2026-07-31 15:56
@zackwhittaker@mastodon.social if nobody sues... There's only one conclusion to draw from this. Nobody was havked. It's all PR flack keeping a stupendously toxic debt bubble hyped.
-
@zackwhittaker@mastodon.social 2026-07-31 11:00
Anthropic said its investigation was consistent with its "blameless postmortem culture." Bullshit! There's absolutely blame here; both OpenAI and Anthropic published blog posts literally detailing their crimes. If companies can't keep their own dangerous tech safe, they should face the consequences.
-
@msfjarvis@fantastic.earth 2026-07-31 10:49
@zackwhittaker@mastodon.social I've never seen two companies more excited to report that they have been engaging in cyber crime. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so fucking depressing
-
@tymwol@hachyderm.io 2026-07-31 11:04
@zackwhittaker@mastodon.social It's not copyright infringement if done by AI. It's not hacking if done by AI. It's not a wrong answer (but probabilistic reasoning) if written by AI.