Post #4170041
2026-07-28 15:39 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@evan@cosocial.ca 2026-07-28 17:54
@julian so, here's what RFC 7033 says: "The host to which a WebFinger query is issued is significant. If the query target contains a "host" portion (Section 3.2.2 of RFC 3986), then the host to which the WebFinger query is issued SHOULD be the same as the "host" portion of the query target, unless the client receives instructions through some out-of-band mechanism to send the query to another host. [...]"
-
@benpate@mastodon.social 2026-07-28 18:03
@julian I believe there was a questionably named “WebFist” protocol that allowed cross-server WebFinger. https://indieweb.org/Webfist
-
@trwnh@mastodon.social 2026-07-29 07:38
@julian You're not wrong -- it's just generally not considered "authoritative". Compare to DNS via the authoritative nameserver, versus DNS via a public resolver. dns:trwnh.com is different than dns://8.8.8.8/trwnh.com in that the latter is explicitly resolved via Google, or dns://1.1.1.1/trwnh.com to resolve via Cloudflare.
-
@wronglang@bayes.club 2026-07-28 17:08
@julian just out of curiosity is it related to this funny looking thing? https://wrong.webfinger-canary.fietkau.software/canary