Post #4120791

Why is it that pro-LLM people always respond to bans (or potential bans) of LLM-generated code by suggesting that LLM users will simply continue to use LLMs but hide the fact that they’re doing so? You’re just announcing that you’re a fundamentally dishonest and untrustworthy person who thinks rules don’t apply to you (and/or that you think most of your fellow LLM-lovers are). Who is this meant to persuade?