← Feed
@kravietz@agora.echelon.pl
Post #4115080
2026-07-26 15:15 UTC
When I saw LGBT people on Hamas parades, wearing their green jihadi bandanas along with LGBT symbols in Europe and London I was seriously wondering “are they suicidal?”
Haven’t they seen gay people dropped to death from buildings in Gaza and hanged from cranes in Iran? Or they just pretended it’s all “traitors” as Hamas excuses it?
The tragedy in Berlin is terrible and I very much hope some people will now see for real what kind of ideology they had been, directly or indirectly, fostering.
If you are condemning violence by European nationalist far-right you’re 100% right, except it’s now time to recognise the fact that there’s a whole more spectrum further to the right even from Nazis - that’s the radical Islamism, represented among others by Hamas. You defend them under the “human rights” umbrella except you apply it to people outright reject the ideas of human rights in the first place. And rule of law. And individual freedoms. And everything that Europe was built on.
European left hiding their heads in sand and calling anyone criticising lenient treatment of these bastards as “Islamophobic” greatly contributed to their growth in impunity.
PS. I was married to a perfectly normal Muslim woman so please spare me the “you’re just Islamophobic” bullshit. Islam is not the same as Islamist extremism and widespread ignorance in this is yet another contributing factor.
Replies (2)
-
@kravietz@agora.echelon.pl The biggest fallacy of humans is the "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" approach.
I have no qualms saying the the attack of the U.S. on Iran is a war of aggression, but that doesn''t make Iranian government righteous. They are not. Compared to them even Trump seems to be a rational person.
I can call the attacks on Gaza by the Israelis to be in violation of the the Geneva accords, but that doesn't make Hamas less a terrorist organization. They are an organization of unspeakable evil.
Fighting against a baddie does not make you good. Somehow this seems to be a surprisingly difficult to understand concept.
Open ##4115078
-
@kravietz@agora.echelon.pl
The workaround is that in the worldview of oppressors vs oppressed, it's crucial to deny any agency of the oppressed. If someone is defined as oppressed, anything they do will be explained away a result of the oppression. They will just automatically claim that they only kill gay people because oppression. It's the basic thought-stopping cliche.
Open ##4115293