Post #4042815

2026-07-23 08:58 UTC

@gedankenstuecke@scholar.social @codefloe@social.tchncs.de Your replies are childish and ignore facts and reality. Why? Comment on the points I've raised in my previous post instead of continuing to reply with a high-level sarcastic wording. CodeFloe offers a home for projects without any profit goal or other commercial interest. The platform doesn't gain/win anything from new users in the first place. It even pays for them and their free use unconditionally. You're really fighting the wrong player here. 🤷‍♂️ #codeberg #codefloe

Replies (2)

@jaredwhite@indieweb.social 2026-07-23 17:07

@pat_dev@social.linux.pizza @gedankenstuecke@scholar.social @codefloe@social.tchncs.de I believe in an ideal world we could recognize the benefits of platforms like Codeberg and CodeFloe alike, which aim to solve different problems even while using similar underlying technology (aka Forgejo). Instead, I find it very difficult to find any merits whatsoever to your antagonizing attitude towards Codeberg. Many people who might be attracted to putting *some* projects on CodeFloe are very likely using Codeberg as well. (Like me!) This is bad form.

Open ##4042813
@gedankenstuecke@scholar.social 2026-07-23 09:01

@pat_dev@social.linux.pizza @codefloe@social.tchncs.de no, it's just structurally just yet another platform that is not owned by its users - and the people running it are pretending it's a benefit. You have outright mentioned in your first reply that being democratically organised is detrimental to decision making speed and that you are about 'code, performance and progress' - it's fine if democratic structures are 'too hard' for people, but that means again being fully depended on someone else's - here on your - good will

Open ##4437555