Post #4015089
2026-07-22 14:18 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@mdc@mstdn.ca 2026-07-22 15:13
@cwebber@social.coop Plagiarism issues aside, keeping the scope of generative models as 'fancy auto-complete' or 'fancy healing brush' that run locally is the only way I can see this tech being reasonably useful and benign
-
@cwebber@social.coop 2026-07-22 14:22
And yes, I do think there is a way to do this, and if I weren't deeply invested in the work I am doing, I might be working on it right now, but also wrestling with this very dilemma above.
-
@davidgerard@circumstances.run 2026-07-22 14:34
@cwebber@social.coop i'd first very much like to see how you achieve these magical flying unicorn ponies before i put effort into arguing the precise aerodynamics of the wing feathers
-
@tiotasram@kolektiva.social 2026-07-23 01:07
@cwebber@social.coop doing this would accelerate the chasing-after-technical-solutions-to-social problems that defines the current tech climate.* That one of the most popular technical "solutions" among the very wealthy/powerful is fascism is not something on your list of things to change, nor would (even somehow radically more democratic) AI help change that. Defeating the current wave of fascism is table stakes, quite possibly for the survival of the species (*both* in terms of avoiding nuclear winter *and* in terms of avoiding climate collapse). So no, I don't think this would be helpful. Yet, I'm also someone captivated by the ideas of AI research.