Post #3942306
2026-06-11 18:41 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@landley@mstdn.jp 2026-06-13 18:44
Increasing clock speed stopped helping Moore's Law move forward around 2003, "CPU performance growth as we have known it hit a wall" http://www.gotw.ca/publications/concurrency-ddj.htm Then around 2013 shrinking feature size stopped helping Moore's Law move forward. Here the coinventor of the FinFET (a transistor built on its side so it looks smaller from above) said "Nobody knows anymore what 16 nm means or what 14 nm means". https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-status-of-moores-law-its-complicated Clock speed and resolution both succumbed to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law
-
@cmsdengl@mas.to 2026-06-11 18:45
@landley@mstdn.jp We Computer Scientists were saying Moore's Law would plateau around 2023. as fabrication hit quantum interference limits