Post #3873892
2026-07-16 13:56 UTC
@RandamuMaki@mstdn.social @libroraptor@mastodon.nz It depends on the student. There are students who will be into chemistry purely for the analytical & pure science aspects of it. And there will be students that need the narrative of the historical, economic, and cultural significance of it. Teaching should be able to accommodate both students.
Replies (1)
-
@libroraptor@mastodon.nz 2026-07-16 20:15
@fskornia@glammr.us @RandamuMaki@mstdn.social This is true. There's even a variety of pedagogical theories that address it. I find the stuff on relevance dry and fairly boring but I took strongly to William Perry's scheme of intellectual and ethical development. It doesn't tell you want to do in class; it merely describes levels of epistemic engagement and the motivations that go with them. It's so much easier to accommodate students whom you have some way to understand and empathise with. Then there's Ed Deci and Rich Ryan's self-determination theory, specifically the part about intrinsic motivation. Incredibly powerful.