Post #3859078
2026-07-16 12:55 UTC
@androcat@toot.cat @tante@tldr.nettime.org It was about whether contributors should be able to opt out of getting replies from their "AI" code review tooling, as I understand it
Replies (1)
-
@androcat@toot.cat 2026-07-16 12:59
@HaTetsu@mastodon.com.pl If so, it's extremely irresponsible of Linus to say "it's useful" without specifying "as a stochastic spell check, in addition to other quality assurance tools", because very bad people are going to take his "it's undeniably useful" and attach it to the very much not useful code-excretion that is ruining everything. @tante@tldr.nettime.org