Post #3734025
2026-06-20 13:21 UTC
@matt@toot.cafe Well, regarding the environmental claims, we do have some research material nowadays that, in my eyes, is pretty reliable. https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:10647/UNU-INWEH-Report-The_Env_Cost_of_AI-2026.pdf
Obviously it isn't as easy, it is an ethical discussion after all. I still don't think that the solution to a systematic problem that is literally human-made is to have everyone and nature pay for it. If we were to fix the impact somehow, that'd be a different story.
Replies (1)
-
@menelion@dragonscave.space 2026-06-20 13:23
@ToniBarth@troet.cafe @matt@toot.cafe for me as a technosolutionist that's easy: if a technology poses a problem, we need to invent another technology to solve it. that's how the tech progress works. Coal/fuel energy is bad, hence there is solar and nuclear, for example.