Post #3699645
2026-05-12 21:12 UTC
@joel@gts.tumfatig.net out of interest, is zfs send | zfs recv not an option? I'd expect that to handle zfs to zfs much more efficiently than rsync.
Replies (1)
-
@joel@gts.tumfatig.net 2026-05-12 21:19
@paul@notnull.space I thought about it but I may have problems with dataset not being the exact same between both. Like source has sub-directories that are now datasets on destination. EDIT: I will probably end up doing a simple one-to-one send/recv to transfer data and then do some move to local dataset. If I can't have rsync finish the whole copy.