Post #3270097
2026-06-06 05:44 UTC
Replies (13)
-
@jonuriarte@tldr.nettime.org 2026-06-06 05:50
How ironic that my toot has been automatically retooted by a bot that on its description says it is curated and handmade while it instantaneously boosts anything AI tagged
-
@suetanvil@freeradical.zone 2026-06-06 13:12
@jonuriarte@tldr.nettime.org This could be a 30 Rock subplot. Wow!
-
@uncleslacky@federate.social 2026-06-06 15:43
@jonuriarte@tldr.nettime.org Reminds me of how Ford Prefect chose his name on the basis of it being so popular.
-
@djsundog@fedi.reclaim.technology 2026-06-06 17:55
@jonuriarte@tldr.nettime.org almost fifty years old and still applicable, if people would just understand.
-
@EF@mastodon.bsd.cafe 2026-06-06 18:48
@jonuriarte@tldr.nettime.org #AI produces #slop so does #starbucks so a match made in heaven.
-
@rickpelletier@toad.social 2026-06-07 00:13
@jonuriarte@tldr.nettime.org I mean, the story is about all of the humans who fucked up and how they were all held responsible for the AI output
-
@oscarfalcon@mastodon.social 2026-06-07 00:32
@jonuriarte@tldr.nettime.org How about we distribute this throughout the world and make the coffee seller PAY! Fuck Them!
-
@janeishly@beige.party 2026-06-07 06:01
@jonuriarte@tldr.nettime.org All the translators in the world going "It would have cost you like 40$ to get a human to do this. Maybe 200$ if you were paying top rates. And they'd have said 'you can't do this' and given you a campaign that would have worked".
-
@Monolecte@framapiaf.org 2026-06-07 06:06
@jonuriarte@tldr.nettime.org L’IA est un symptôme : celui d’une économie qui a partout fait la promotion de gens stupides et/ou paresseux, mais avides de notoriété et de récompenses. Ce sont eux qui portent cette technologie au pinacle. Ils aiment le fait qu’elle remplace les gens qui savaient et qui travaillaient réellement, ceux qui les faisaient passer pour les bouffons qu’ils sont en réalité. L’IA est là pour flatter les gens sans aucune « intelligence naturelle ».
-
@nosword@localization.cafe 2026-06-07 08:08
@jonuriarte@tldr.nettime.org A lot of people seem to believe that it was an intentional dog whistle thing and the executives just misjudged how angry it would make normal people. In which case the AI thing is basically an enabling factor, or perhaps an excuse. I don’t know Korean or understand enough about Korean history and society to weigh up the evidence there, but “Right-wingers in echo chamber overestimate their popularity” is certainly a plausible story...
-
@NatureMC@mastodon.online 2026-06-07 09:10
@jonuriarte@tldr.nettime.org Just a note to your post: AI systems don't learn like humans, they have no intelligence. They are trained by their human makers on that right-wing stuff. Then the programs just build combinations after patterns. Imagine it like a big failing autocorrection. Only what the trainers fill in, comes out, in many possible combinations.
-
@glent@aus.social 2026-06-07 14:55
@jonuriarte@tldr.nettime.org This isn't just an AI story. It's also about how the chaebol class is so disconnected from mainline South Korean society that they did not see the problem. This is stoking anger more than any AI aspect. The chaebol class don't need the help of AI to be right wing: their grandfathers being the supporters of the President who murdered the Gwangju May 18 demonstrators; and their fathers opposing the ultimately-successful 1987 demonstrators.
-
@Voline@kolektiva.social 2026-06-08 00:58
@jonuriarte@tldr.nettime.org @mick_collins@toot.community https://kolektiva.social/@Voline/116710285296480286