Post #3217584
2025-07-15 20:18 UTC
Rather than trying to peer review each research output at a fixed point in time, the aim is to provide well-organized mechanisms for researchers to engage with each other’s work, enabling the value of research outputs to become clear over time as a result of a process of scholarly dialogue.
Replies (1)
-
@LudoWaltman@social.cwts.nl 2025-07-15 20:19
How to facilitate meaningful scholarly dialogue is a key challenge for the scientific publishing system going forward. Addressing this challenge needs to be accompanied by assessment reform, moving away from the current practice of giving special status to peer-reviewed outputs relative to other work.