Post #3217585
2025-07-15 20:19 UTC
How to facilitate meaningful scholarly dialogue is a key challenge for the scientific publishing system going forward. Addressing this challenge needs to be accompanied by assessment reform, moving away from the current practice of giving special status to peer-reviewed outputs relative to other work.
Replies (2)
-
@LudoWaltman@social.cwts.nl 2025-07-15 20:22
@cwts@social.cwts.nl @RoRInstitute@indieweb.social @ASAPbio@mas.to @PeerCommunityIn@ecoevo.social @ReviewCommons@sciencemastodon.com @richardsever@mas.to @stephenpinfield@mstdn.social @kathleengregory@mastodon.social @andrebrasil@social.cwts.nl
-
@jeroenbosman@akademienl.social 2025-07-16 13:45
@LudoWaltman@social.cwts.nl thanks for sharing this. I recognize the various challenges. We can discuss the timelines of course. The openness challenge is ongoing, maybe half-solved, but without radical changes will take at least 10 more years. And then there's the AI challenge and the challenge of communicating results/output and their status with non-specialist and wider audiences.