Post #2888045
2025-11-03 10:30 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@danana_dread@tech.lgbt 2025-11-03 15:40
@Natanox@chaos.social @fr2@chaos.social @zl2tod@mastodon.online @jon@henshaw.social To put it another way, calling humanity a cancer is an ethically lazy Easy-Way-Out sorta argument, when you think about it. It relies on the idea that we are somehow separate from the natural world, too. We've got the capacity to self reflect and change our behavior. There's a world in which it's normal to see ourselves as part of our environment and planet, living in conversation with and as part of its systems. Just as humans are capable of kindness to each other, we are just as capable of acting as responsible stewards, if we hold ourselves accountable to be that.
-
@fr2@chaos.social 2025-11-03 17:35
@Natanox@chaos.social @zl2tod@mastodon.online @jon@henshaw.social To us it is, but to someone who grew up with it, it will just sound like another crazy leftist calling random stuff "fascism" without any concrete link to a definition ever being dropped. So There's reasons to bother with showing some part of the reasoning, even if it's annoying. I've seen results from it where it kept a community safer. (One must imagine sisyphus happy)