Post #2836344
2025-06-10 22:30 UTC
> Unauthorized access is not possible.
Unauthorized access to… what exactly? To the servers, which the story is not about? To data on the servers, which again, the story is not about?
Or do they mean the traffic? Because if they mean the traffic here, then GNM's access to it, as the networking provider, would be totally authorized after all.
So, either they are talking about something irrelevant (servers), or they make a statement that looks good but does not actually contradict the story.
🧵
Replies (1)
-
@rysiek@mstdn.social 2025-06-10 22:33
> Telegram has neither employees nor servers in Russia. There we go with the servers again! Regarding employees – okay, so was Vedeneev a contractor? In the story he himself says that that the arrangement was "informal". Telegram tries to pull a "Schrödinger's Vedeneev" here. He's an "employee" when handling the hardware in Florida, but not an "employee" in Russia? I guess? Regardless, all that is beside the point, which is: traffic analysis and cleartext device identifier. 🧵 #Telegram