2026-05-09 18:36 UTC
Replies (9)
-
@john.kreitlow.rocks@bsky.brid.gy 2026-05-09 20:56
What they have is literally one `` away from being a custom element with declarative shadow DOM
-
@julientaq@mastodon.social 2026-05-09 20:58
@ricmac@mastodon.social be ready for everything canvas.
-
@slightlyoff@toot.cafe 2026-05-10 00:23
@ricmac@mastodon.social STOP GIVING THEM IDEAS (for free)
-
@mudasobwa@mastodon.social 2026-05-10 07:51
@ricmac@mastodon.social Agentic DOM
-
@kAlvaro@mastodon.social 2026-05-10 12:09
@ricmac@mastodon.social "What if we create a special well-defined language, based on symbols and English keywords, to interact with LLM that avoids the ambiguity of natural language and allows to separate code from data?"
-
@robin@daugherty.nl 2026-05-10 20:58
@ricmac@mastodon.social “What if we name tags semantically so that we can reuse styles for items with similar meaning instead of generating tailwind classes on everything?”
-
@hewer_of_code@mstdn.ca 2026-05-10 22:07
@ricmac@mastodon.social If not that, then perhaps they'll realize that the semantics of html tags don't match up with their needs, and they'll want some extensible language of markup.
-
@AVincentInSpace@furry.engineer 2026-05-11 07:25
@ricmac@mastodon.social oh dear god they are aren't they they're gonna discover static templating and push 100% of the code to the client
-
@paulhebert@sunny.garden 2026-05-11 18:32
@ricmac@mastodon.social hopefully they discover static site builders instead