Post #2677328
2025-06-16 15:48 UTC
@Mer__edith@mastodon.world @Viss@mastodon.social
While I appreciate the overall sentiment, "no surveillance ads" seems oddly specific, like something is in the pipeline that needs that wording.
Replies (3)
-
@mattsains@mastodon.social 2025-06-16 16:16
@FritzAdalis@infosec.exchange @Mer__edith@mastodon.world @Viss@mastodon.social https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/002/659/979/108.png
-
@kainisenni@vocalounge.cafe 2025-06-16 16:27
@FritzAdalis@infosec.exchange I think that Signal's requests for donations can count as ads, hence the wording. If they were planning something evil they'd just lie. @Mer__edith@mastodon.world @Viss@mastodon.social
-
@MisuseCase@twit.social 2025-06-19 00:14
@FritzAdalis@infosec.exchange @Mer__edith@mastodon.world @Viss@mastodon.social Almost all ads on the internet are surveillance ads, which is why it’s notable that Signal doesn’t have them.