Post #2525150
2023-11-03 15:25 UTC
@narF@mstdn.ca @ABScientist@forall.social @User47@vmst.io I don’t think this is the case for me. I try not to chalk up to malice what can be explained by ignorance/complacency.
They spent a ton of money on an office in the most expensive place in San Diego. They want people there using it. I don’t think it goes farther than that honestly outside of what I consider the poor business decision of not just renting rack space somewhere for the remaining on prem servers and divesting from the office expense entirely.
Replies (1)
-
@narF@mstdn.ca 2023-11-03 19:41
@bflipp@vmst.io @ABScientist@forall.social @User47@vmst.io Maybe it's just that. I don't know about your particular company and it's office space. But remember that banks own a lot of those office spaces (or their mortgages). And those same banks are often shareholders of those companies. They don't want their revenues from mortgages to dry up so they use their shareholder pressure to influence companies into forcing a return to office. Even if the CEO and the workers think it's a bad idea.