Post #2441106
2026-05-10 14:53 UTC
@drahardja@sfba.social Yeah I agree that unfortunately it doesn’t seem Katie Porter is viable and we have to vote with the numbers here. Steve Hilton is polling way ahead unfortunately. But Steyer and Becerra are both polling ahead of Chad Bianca. So honestly I think I’m voting for Steyer. Becerra is pro oil drilling, it’s insane. I see him a regressive candidate. I’d rather take my chances with the guy that at least claims to have a progressive platform
Replies (1)
-
@ksclarke@code4lib.social 2026-05-14 17:05
@danirabbit@mastodon.online @drahardja@sfba.social I'm not in CA (so not super knowledgeable about the race), but I telework in CA so pay some attention to it. I'm curious... is the reason Porter isn't seen as viable those complaints about her treatment of staffers awhile back (did that just leave a bad taste in people's mouths) or is there something else? The idea of voting for a billionaire to get a progressive platform seems backwards to me.