Post #2405181
2026-04-02 07:54 UTC
@RejoinEU@mastodon.online
The big problem with this (which I agree with in principle) is that the rest of NATO have spent their (reduced) defence money on a completely unconnected range of weaponry, except where they have brought US weapons and are dependant on the US for maintenance or supplies !
Including in the case of the UK the Nuclear Weapons we are trying to suggest are on a par with the completely independent French one.
Trump has even openly talked about the ability to turn off aspects of those weapons!
For example it was only a previous presidential decision by Clinton that allowed civilians to access "un-degraded" positional data.
Virtually irreplaceable for targetting etc the US controls this.
Hopefully the European version Galileo can be used by these US built systems (though i note the Wikipedia page suggests it's still being upgraded this year).
Replies (1)
-
@RejoinEU@mastodon.online 2026-04-02 08:11
@cockneylaurie@mastodonapp.uk I thoroughly agree - it would be very regrettable for all the reasons you set out. NATO is however, a Defence Alliance. Trump's endeavour to force into his illegal offensive attack on Iran is a perversion of its very reason for existence. (Unsuprising perhaps from a pervert). If he succeeds, NATO will be changed, forever, from a organisation dedicated to preservation of peace, to a tool for US presidents to employ at whim to prosecute war. Better to address the inconveniences.