Post #2391460
2025-11-16 22:28 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.com 2025-11-16 22:32
@futurebird@sauropods.win @Routhinator@tenforward.social Wouldn’t it have the opposite effect of speeding up adoption by giving false ideas about the quality of its outcome?
-
@sabik@rants.au 2025-11-17 00:32
@futurebird@sauropods.win @Routhinator@tenforward.social Doing it the right way and saying it was AI doesn't really address most (if any) of the objections; better than not, but far from ideal
-
@f4grx@chaos.social 2025-11-17 18:51
@futurebird@sauropods.win @Routhinator@tenforward.social oh wow the mental breakdown. Attribute all the brain time you poured in a project to the worst tech of all times... I would not accept I think.
-
@vv@solarpunk.moe 2025-11-20 02:53
@futurebird@sauropods.win @Routhinator@tenforward.social a lot of times the work is planned at too high of a level for this to be possible. you're just doing a small part of the work and making a drastic change to the architecture isn't feasible.