Post #2308041
2026-04-13 01:10 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@AlexanderKingsbury@mastodon.social 2026-04-13 01:11
@Quasit@kolektiva.social @minmi@sfba.social Yet another pile of nonsense from someone who fails (or refuses) to grasp basic facts or consider history honestly.
-
@GhostOnTheHalfShell@masto.ai 2026-04-13 01:21
RE: https://masto.ai/@GhostOnTheHalfShell/116382527232157424 @Quasit@kolektiva.social @minmi@sfba.social UBI without non-market alternatives to capitalists. UBI already exist in the United States. It’s lavished on the super wealthy. The brief summary here is the federal government creates money when it spends money, our taxes delete money. The super rich control gov and they control the magic money machine. They decide spending . They also decide taxes. They get all the money and aren’t taxed and we get pennies which are taxed. They keep. ours is destroyed.
-
@Quasit@kolektiva.social 2026-04-13 03:24
@minmi@sfba.social Also, where does the money for the UBI •come• from? Presumably the taxpayers, right? In other words, US! Not the billionaires; they RECEIVE money from the government, they don't pay it. Us. So they will take our money, steal a large chunk of it as they always do, and then give the rest back to us as UBI. And the billionaires, if we don't end them completely, will just keep raising prices again and again. Billionaires are cancer. As long as they exist, they will continue to kill us all off. I don't understand how anyone can fail to realize that.
-
@cy@fedicy.us.to 2026-04-13 03:44
It would do good, though not in the way people think. The power of the wealthy is not how much money they have, but how much more money they have. A UBI would cut out the most extreme poverty, which the wealthy rely on to stay wealthy. It's their bargaining chip. Do what we say or this will happen to you. So prices would go up, and poor people wouldn't especially benefit in the long run, but it would curtail the power of the rich. Enough that they're going all out trying to shut down any conversation on it. UBI falsly validates them in some troubling ways, much the same as charity, welfare, and unions do. But it would still do more good than nothing at all. CC: @minmi@sfba.social