Post #2299005
2026-05-07 14:07 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@philip@mastodon.mallegolhansen.com 2026-05-07 14:17
@agnes@pdx.social Same could be said in reverse for people who don’t read English no?
-
@jdlh@mstdn.ca 2026-05-07 20:26
@agnes@pdx.social Good point. But consider whose convenience you are centring. It is the person who 1) can't read my language and 2) wants to communicate _between_ language communities. Consider instead the grandparent who reads my language, but not English, and wants to communicate _within_ their language community. (And, Thai or Arabic may be better examples than Japanese, because they use Latin letters less.) For them, a handle which they can easily read and type is much easier than a foreign one they have to decode. And I suspect that communication within language communities is much more common than between language communities. "Inclusive" means including more people when designing systems. Even people not like the designers.