@CursedSilicon@social.restless.systems
Post #2292116
2026-05-08 23:11 UTC
Replies (10)
-
@Matthew@furry.engineer 2026-05-08 23:17
@CursedSilicon@social.restless.systems i mean this is just another blatantly example of how i think microsoft and all big tech company don't care about consent... they view it as just a given.
-
@krutonium@social.treehouse.systems 2026-05-08 23:38
@CursedSilicon@social.restless.systems Well, they might, in exasperated way.
-
@carbonated_estrogen@transfem.social 2026-05-09 00:03
@CursedSilicon@social.restless.systems it's probably to counteract the overwhelming amount of "no, Microsoft" being shouted as Microsoft continues to do what people ask them not to do, I think unfortunately it's a familiar feeling
-
@michaelgemar@cosocial.ca 2026-05-09 00:11
@CursedSilicon@social.restless.systems @nullagent@partyon.xyz “Remind me, comrade — this enormous data centre that we’re infiltrating to plant the EMP device is owned by Microsoft?” “Yes, Microsoft…”
-
@whyrl@furry.engineer 2026-05-09 00:28
@CursedSilicon@social.restless.systems Those houses will come in handy when the AI bubble bursts.
-
@grayrattus@mastodon.social 2026-05-09 16:47
@CursedSilicon@social.restless.systems do they really create affordable housing? I cant believe that. For sure they get money from it one way or another. Probably via tax benefits or something.
-
@Sonic2k@oldbytes.space 2026-05-09 18:33
@CursedSilicon@social.restless.systems My answer to Microsoft is always NO!
-
@akiran_n@onlyfranz.com 2026-05-09 18:55
@CursedSilicon@social.restless.systems one of the super big company in the world make a thing for the people, and I think with the money they found in the pocket, is the bare minimum of what they can do if they really want to.
-
@marchii_again@ohai.social 2026-05-10 17:07
@CursedSilicon@social.restless.systems i think it was meant to be read as like "yes it was *microsoft* that did this", not in an aquiescing way
-
@jima@mspsocial.net 2026-05-10 22:31
@CursedSilicon@social.restless.systems I assumed "Yes, Microsoft." was in response to the reader's implied "Really? *Microsoft!?*"